Prosecution might then assert that it was your responsibility to employ a system that DID allow for censorship. But I hate that one.
Another option would be to refer the offender to the LEOs. Just shift responsibility. Heck, it could be said that you’re doing the LEOs a service. I like that one.
Yeah, but that doesn’t answer the question.
The best way to stop censorship is to make it impossible. So, if censorship is impossible, how would you handle illegal conversations?
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
Refer to the replies of others here who are having less difficulty than you. Use the power of Lemmy.
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
Don’t understand >> troll.
That’s efficient
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
If it’s impossible to censor people, you would hardly have a strong prosecution arguing you should have done something impossible.
That’s a good point.
Prosecution might then assert that it was your responsibility to employ a system that DID allow for censorship. But I hate that one.
Another option would be to refer the offender to the LEOs. Just shift responsibility. Heck, it could be said that you’re doing the LEOs a service. I like that one.
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
You got a better one?
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;