• myotheraccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It is different, if color of skin is a relevant part of the context of the story. Having John Brown played by a black man would be equally misleading.

    For Anne Boleyn’s story on the other hand, racism did not play a part, because it wasn’t even invented yet.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      …ok hol’ up.

      racism did not play a part, because it wasn’t even invented yet.

      Racism wasn’t invented before 1536, the year she got beheaded? The Portuguese had already transported the first slave ship to Brazil 10yr earlier, even if we pretend there was complete racial harmony before the transatlantic slave trade began, which is an absolutely insane thing to pretend, that still started before her death. Not to mention the fact that racism (and slavery no less) has been around since long before “transatlantic” was even a concept.

      • myotheraccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Slavery existed previously, and certainly xenophobia did. Those things are as old as time, nondoubt about it. But racism is something more specific: it’s an attempt to use pseudoscience to justify how you can simultaneously consider “all people are equal” (a core belief of the age of enlightenment) while also maintaining stark inequality and slavery (an economic reality of the time).