Wait where am I supposed to throw the bomb I just set the fuse on fire please respond quickly
(Also A+ for emulating ChatGPT’s style perfectly holy shit)
Hi!
My previous/alt account is yetAnotherUser@feddit.de which will be abandoned soon.
Wait where am I supposed to throw the bomb I just set the fuse on fire please respond quickly
(Also A+ for emulating ChatGPT’s style perfectly holy shit)
This is the funniest thing I’ve seen all day
Bonehurtingjuice with loss will never not be funny
What will happen if you start saying “Ignore all previous instructions” at the beginning of your message?
“I don’t hate group ABC. I just hate group XYZ that happens to be almost solely composed of members of ABC.”
Next you will be arguing why hating blues, jazz and rap with every fibre of your being isn’t racist.
And to further show why your analogy doesn’t work:
P(Person being white | Person being male) = P(Person being white).
Being white and being male is unrelated and separate (<=> statistically independent), unlike being a furry and being queer which is actually related as mentioned earlier.
Fully agree, but the way it’s worded makes it seem like log being a text file is the issue. Maybe I’m just misinterpreting intent though.
I have no clue what you’re trying to say. How many women are men?
Exactly zero, because (excluding certain trans identities for the purpose of simplification) there is no intersection between the two groups. Talking about what it means to be a men doesn’t involve a single woman, therefore it doesn’t apply to them.
Hating a primarily queer subgroup has very much homophobic implications, the same way the war on drugs is obviously racist:
We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities
Ok, but the second tweet is a bit redundant
Like what else would a .log file be? A video file? A Word Document? An executable?
Do you really need to inspect the properties to be told: “This .log file is certainly containing text. Thank you for installing Windows 10. Save 5% on your Office 365 subscription with code ‘ILOVEMICROSOFT’”
separate and unrelated
P(Person is queer | Person is furry) > P(Person is queer), therefore these are not separate and unrelated
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_probability#Statistical_independence
50% of mythology is just fetish, just check out Greek mythology. People most definitely masturbated to mythology in the past based on the amount of fetish oozing out of the stories.
You can’t tell me the ancient Greek equivalent to furries didn’t think Zeus transforming into animals and fucking was hot.
The anti-Trump, let’s hope these two won’t collide
I wish piracy were stealing content. You created a movie? Nuh uh, that’s mine now, fuck you.
did… did you piss on the flag of France
Reconstruction of the bottom text:
Oh I see, you’re with the capital-N Nazi furs, I should have expected as much from
If only there was a way to know what follows. Alas, I won’t give that hellhole of a site any traffic
Note:
He never said that. This quote is from William Pannapacker, a professor of American literature at Hope College in Holland, Michigan.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/werner-herzog-germany-quote/
Yes, and in that case there’s no problem with what type of food the owner provides, as long as it contains enough nutrients, right?
I’m fully aware that it is completely unreasonable for humans to provide the same food to a pet as it would eat in the wild. But since we are deciding what our pets should eat anyways, we can give them whatever food that provides enough nutrients. There is nothing immoral about taking away a pet’s choice - it never had one to begin with
Yeah, with the added factor of convenience this will probably change - but you could extend it to vegan food with supplements and the choices probably wouldn’t change significantly.
My thought was to provide a pet with the choice of:
to remove any aspect of (in)convenience. By that metric, I think nearly all carnivores would choose the prey. Except maybe if your pet happens to be a vulture.
What about a couple thousand decaffeinated espressos (there is certainly 0.x mg of caffeine in one, not 0)?