Well today I learned, thanks for the correction.
Other accounts:
@subignition@kbin.social (dead?)
@subignition@fedia.io
Well today I learned, thanks for the correction.
They’re pretty reasonable for consensus-based programming prompts as well like “Compare and contrast popular libraries for {use case} in {language}” or “I want to achieve {goal/feature} in {summary of project technologies}, what are some ways I could structure this?”
Of course you still shouldn’t treat any of the output as factual without verifying it. But at least in the former case, I’ve found it more useful than traditional search engines to generate leads to look into, even if I discard some or all of the specific information it asserts
Edit: Which is largely due to traditional search engines getting worse and worse in recent years, sadly
The “P” is for predictive, not pre-trained. Generative Predictive Text
Edit: Nope I was wrong.
This is the best article I’ve seen yet on the topic. It does mention the “how” in brief, but this analogy really explains the “why” Gonna bookmark this in case I ever need to try to save another friend or family member from drinking the Flavor-Aid
I haven’t played Callisto Protocol, but it seems like it’s explicitly a spiritual successor, yeah
Back when I was in high school, it wasn’t uncommon for teachers to use the same restrooms as the students. I can’t quite remember but I think there were only a couple staff toilets on the campus, one in each gendered locker room and one in the front office.
Anyway, my point is there’s at least the possibility that the principal was just using the bathroom normally and the poor kid was being… less than subtle about what he was doing in the stall.
Damn, you’re living in the future. I’m still stuck using three shells.