I’ve never seen “dufus” spelled that way before, it’s immediately enticing.- like you hybridized the word with “Rufus”.

Sexual aggression is illegal in the UK? That sounds pretty boring, ngl.

Cities are trash now, this will only make them worse because corporations are stupid. The new process will look like this:

1. Buy plot of land.
2. Build business without adequate parking.
3. People park on the street, which will remain mysteriously legal but exacerbate the same disasters street parking already causes.
4. Even with that, parking is insufficient. Business goes belly-up, causing urban blight.
5. New investor goes to Step 1.

Chiropracty isn’t “scientific”.

That’s not true. You don’t have to ask someone to stop committing defamation before suing them for defamation.

Does it count as a tell when it’s irrelevant? Everything Trump says is a lie. You can tell he’s lying because his lips are moving. The addition of the word “Sir” doesn’t change anything.

The government can ban tobacco, but it’s undeniably tyrannical to ban a drug because you don’t like the consequences people are choosing for themselves.

Speaking as someone who knows the definition (or more accurately, that there isn’t one), it is not a first amendment issue.

They do, in fact, have a legal leg to stand in. As shareholders, they can sue their board of directors for mismanagement.

Gerrymandering is legal, as is mentioned in the article. What’s not legal is racial gerrymandering. If all a court does is find a map to be gerrymandered, it won’t send it to anyone to be redrawn.

Banning specific guns is pure theater, even if it passes. There’s zero real safety in it.

There is roughly $2.6 trillion dollars in untaxed earnings being held overseas in order to avoid taxation.

This is false. There are zero dollars in untaxed earnings.

Lemmings in several subs, this one included, seem to reliably comment on content they haven’t actually read. It’s bizarre.

It is making mistakes, not lying. To lie it must believe it is telling falsehoods, and it is not capable of belief.

Toll roads are a kind of tax.

The Netherlands don’t have freedom of speech, though, so that’s immaterial. The closest thing they have is Article 7, Subarticle 3 in general, which only means they can’t legally be compelled to seek prior approval for speech.

Well, the poster is mostly linguistic prescriptivism (defining what words mean). That small caveat at the bottom that words can mean whatever you want them to can’t really defeat the entire rest of the poster.

So far it seems like Reddit but with a lot less content. I’m assuming that’s primarily a popularity problem.