That’s the tide, a rising tide is the people getting money.

I would want the door open for any gender my kid was attracted to unless I knew kids with the other kid are impossible.

I don’t doubt that the trades are complicated, but I have no gauge for how effective trade schools are for trades. I have reason to be skeptical of trade schools for computer programmers.

The grads coming from less rigorous 4 year programs are already lacking. Computer programming is complex enough that I would be very reluctant to learn from a trade school that took less than four years.

From Wikipedia

It goes back to at least the year 1230, and was excluded from the OED from the 18th century until 1960. So it wasn’t just Americans.

You can. But it’s not required.

It’s not just the camera, it’s the geometry. A car can fit into a narrower space from a narrower lane backing in.

If you’re views diverge sharply from the mainstream, you’re radical.

If you think we should change society to bring about gender equality, you are radical. If you think it society is good with some small tweaks like legislating parity of pay or a certain number of women in c-suite positions, you’re a liberal feminist.

Afaict most supposed terfs are actually either non feminist conservatives or liberal feminists.

I don’t know how often exploits that this would prevent are found, but sometimes

Nazi Germany was the template, so there can be no answer more right than this that isn’t based on Nazi Germany.

Are palm trees not a grass?

I don’t have the ability to easily verify users. A user verification service would be great. I think it could work decentralized, but maybe have a separate service for it. Servers independently authenticate, and federate with each other. If one starts authenticating poorly, defederate.

I don’t think it’s a good fit within Lemmy or Mastodon, or … Because I don’t think someone who runs a server wants to bother with it. It needs to be it’s own service that integrates with other services.

What were Mark Rubio’s words? Oh yeah… “past, current, or expected beliefs”.

They are already explicitly past thoughtcrime being “deportable” and have moved onto expected future thoughtcrime.

Would they really have started killing so quickly? Like, I’d think they’d want to wait a couple of months and ease us into it

Is this something that could be integrated into lemmy itself?

Do you have reason to think that? Organizations that use mainframes keep them up-to-date in my experience.

This sounds like a big assumption.

Bougie

To be clear I didn’t mean the rhetoric makes it likely, I mean an attack on Canada makes it likely. I think and hope that the rhetoric is market manipulation, and largely empty.

Whether that changes your opinion, idk.

What I mean is that the constant flippant “he can do what he wants” supports him now in the same way the confident “we’re safe because what he suggested is illegal.” if Trump was really that powerful the judges that would rule against him wouldn’t have the chance.

Things are bad, but acting like it’s already over literally strengthens the fascists.