Many thanks!

I’m not OP but I think it means “Providers are saying consumers should accept subscription-based models without complaint”

it does have some qualities of Nirvana fallacy in that it implies my support for a policy is inadequate unless I provide a perfect, personal solution. but thanks for your response.

Nope, these sheriffs do not “want it for elections”, they want it for themselves. We’re on the same side here and I’m sorry to be antagonistic but I don’t agree with you excusing their behavior as principled in any way unless you also do it for sovereign citizens, because it is exactly the same thing: “the rules only apply to me when it’s convenient.”

why is “interest from women” the last item? anon claims Greek lifestyle but ignores that the ancient Greeks normalized homosexual behavior? .

It’s a funny meme but it reeks of ignorance and entitlement.

It’s called a fucking ferret? That’s adorable? I want one? wtf I’m screaming

Nirvana fallacy, also know as “perfect solution fallacy” is suggesting that no solution is better than an imperfect solution. If I can’t have nirvana, I don’t want anything.

I see it all the time in online arguments. “Oh, you advocate for housing the homeless? Well then why do you have empty rooms in your house? Just fill it with homeless people.” this is an example of the fallacy. It suggests that my solution, “house the homeless” should be discarded because it is not a perfect solution, which would be filling my house up with strangers. The goal is to make me say, “oh, I’m not willing to do that, so we should do nothing instead.”

I asked a dealer for a dumb-car. No fucking auto 911 dialing, bluetooth enabled, GPS service horseshit, just a normal car and he shot me

Thanks I’m panicking now! 🫠

Please explain what this means? The rhetoric concepts I mean, not the subject matter

Later there’s this text:

which can be found by clicking on the cog at the top right next to the search icon

…which I don’t see. I don’t think this doc accounts for Photon.

Who controls it? Can I suggest edits to these docs?

Are you a software developer?

Why is that the requirement to vote third party?

I don’t need to have a replacement ready. It’s enough for me to say that the current system does not work.

Bad people shouldn’t be in positions of power. Why aren’t we protected from this? We’re being abused and no one is stopping it. I want to send a message somehow.

When I navigate to the article I instantly get a blue and red “sign up” popup that darkens the article behind it and prevents selecting text. Does anyone know how to prevent these? ublock origin is great, but I’d prefer something autonomous that prevents these altogether.

You sound like a privileged white man.

I would argue they are perfectly placed, not misplaced.

My counter argument is that injury and death caused by reckless driving is not solved by the police. And worse, the prison crisis is doing great harm to our society, mostly to people of color.

I was countering what that person said, and you think it’s misplaced? I think what you mean is it’s not convenient to you. Seems to be a trend.

But how would you tie a steak in a knot? You’re going to have to be a lot more specific

Lol privileged white guy gets to joke about a problem that will never hurt him