tldr Sudden Death card

really good research skills? you’re going to need more than an internet connrection.

risc-V laptops might compete with arm in a few years - maybe not for power users, but for most simpl use , or for those who will just ssh into real computer.

dd

Big numbers first is not the only way to sort - look at say how they sort the speeds of runners in a race.

If it is “backwards”, it is sorted, in reverse order. If it has an element out of place it is not sorted.

It’s only when they extend to hh:mm:ss dd/mm/yyyy that it becomes assorted. They need to fully commit and either use tzmm:tzhh+ fff.ss:mm:hh dd/mm/yyyy or just use fucking iso 8601. Fuck everyone who doesn’t; fuck M$, fuck oracle, fuck humans.

Chisel is just a type of blade or wedge. Equivalent to an axe or even just a a napped flint edge really.

I dont know if there’s any way to know whether fire (as a purposely used technology) predates axe/wedge/blade concept.

I’d guess that axes blades and wedges predate wheels due to being a lot simpler.

I guess abrasives are also very simple.

it’s called taking a “selfpee”

Replace beer with piss.

I think you might be missing the part where memes are not real. aur is useful. arch wiki is useful.

Just install it from AUR.

eat? no, eeat.

https://youtu.be/ADRGgyhX4YE?t=59

going to surpass ‘unknown’ any year now. it’s happening.

https://invidious.reallyaweso.me/watch?v=qK5nqmHz0UA

and stop smoking whatever shit theyre peddling.

removed by mod

yeah, studies like that need to do a lot of work - if they’re any good - and look at a a lot of different angles… The news articles usually do a terrible job of explaining such studies and the strengths and weaknesses - so it is hard to see the real evidence base or assess how much weight to put on it.

Unfortunately, in my opinion - the best way to know if such studies are any good is to ignore the news article completely , find the the full paper and spend a bit of time trawling through it.

did you read crash by JG Ballard?

They did present the data on the measured* levels and changes over the period, tables 43 and 44. And table 45 shows the observed trend and the counterfactual that they estimated in order to estimate the impact. (as womble pointed you can’t measure an impact outside of a laboratory on something with complex influences, because you can’t measure the counterfactual).

They don’t want to attribute the whole meaasured improvement in air quality to ULEZ, as some of the change should attributed to other influences or pre-existing trends.

• of course you just can’t measure 100% of the air in a place accurately without asphyxiating the people in it, so they use data from an array of detectors sampling the air at regular intervals.

Removed by mod

doom