The way you word it suggests that donations to Mozilla are expressly forbidden from being spent on Firefox. Which I doubt is true.

But yes, many would prefer to donate specifically for Firefox development than into a general pool for Mozilla to allocate as they choose.

Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

All: 🫠

At least we don’t use the Roman method of varied hour lengths depending in the time of day and times of year.

In what way?

I’m not on desktop so can’t inspect to see the img src.

But it’s possible for a url in img src to have a different response (ie, html) when it’s a direct navigation (ie new tab).

Presumably to disable that hot linking from other websites/apps. Especially if they use scrapers.

But yeah, bad ux.

bootstrapping problem.

Always been a fan of it being Hal Finney, regardless of any evidence. It’s poetic symmetry with losing both around the same time.

How does the use of ccTLDs furthers harms against the countries?

Misread the headline as e-bikes.