no that’s literally the description of the other axis…
no that’s literally the description of the other axis…
as i understand it, the money goes to the foundation, and it’s the corporation that develops the browser. so it’s probably not strictly forbidden, but it does imply that the money is not for browser development.
it’s when you dodge all the shots
the Chilluminati podcast episode on him talks about how he had a really squeaky voice. like, imagine if mickey mouse could karate chop you.
also, he is still alive.
in the health sector specifically, IT is a mess because you can’t stop people from working or there will be deaths. one thing you should take away from this is that their jobs are important and it is crucial that they can do them. it is your job to support them; anything that stops them doing their job or makes it take longer, even once, is dangerous. improving infra for its own sake is not a good idea because it comes at the risk of peoples lives. the details don’t matter in the face of that.
if this stresses you out, you can absolutely change jobs. i did.
if you think you can work within those parameters, and you think you can find ways to improve the system in-place while mitigating the risks, then you will be highly respected.
hypothesis: the last reply is usually left there to stop hundreds of people replying that exact same thing below.
sure, do that. and good luck with this, i did something similar for a project once and as usual its those last 5% that are going to cost you 90% of the time.
mozilla takes donations, but they don’t fund Firefox development with that money. that’s usually what people have against it.
i’ve seen something like this before, where the kernel holds the file handle open for the process so that it thinks the file is still there. i think it’s related to how the program closes the file but i don’t remember the details. restarting qbittorent will most likely fix it.
your reaction makes me more confident that this may turn into something interesting :)
i take it then that files must have some ownership information associated with them, to distinguish the author from a relay node? or is that just a private key.
i’m interested in the dynamic linking, what mechanism is used to stop situations like left-pad or the pypi incident where a file is removed replaced with a malicious alternative?
if I’m reading this right, it’s a bit like ipfs+dht. is this a content-addressable system?
anyway, you should probably have demos of
thoughts:
also, please convert the whitepaper to a format that is actually readable. rtf? really?
the amount of dust under that throne…
of course not. the american “system of checks and balances” only works if everyone plays by the rules.
because political dissidents who are in jail for trying to overthrow a dictatorship should also be able to run. it’s one of those unfortunate situations where this would be a good thing to have under an authoritarian government…
i spend a lot of time with scb data, its fascinating stuff.
you’re sort of mixing my points together in order to get the least charitable interpretation. the “only” and “and” are doing some heavy lifting. i don’t feel like doing this whole semantic song and dance every time i post something just because people refuse to read between the lines. let’s leave it at you gave numbers and those numbers taught me something.
i can chime in with some actual experience!
my current problems with KDE are
and what’s fun about this is, the issues are so intermittent and random that i never know what i’m going to get on a given day!