Again ICC and ICJ are 2 different courts. You are not listening to my arguments. You are responding for the sake of responding.
The US has never had genocide cases brought against it to the ICJ, so you are theorizing the issue there. Instead of talking about hypotheticals, it is important to stick to factual events that actually took place while also making the distinction that the ICC is separate court that has nothing to do with the ICJ. ICJ stopped further genocide in Bosnia and recently for the Rohingya people in Myanmar. Here’s a list of all ICJ cases to date.
The USA is not the one on trial at the Hague, so you are definitely delusional and in your feelings there. And the ICJ has before put a stop to many genocides.
The facts keeps breaking your brains as regards matters international foreign policy and the issue with Israel. Unless you send U.S soldiers to continue the genocide, an ICJ determination will prevail in Gaza. Your feelings do not matter on this. Only facts.
The US: “I am going to say I don’t support this, but I do, and all of you understand that I do, and you all know what will happen if you refuse”
True. The world has been following along with this narrative. But times are changing (the US foreign policy has never been weaker) and I don’t think when it comes to it, any country wants to be seen internationally as a supporter of genocide. The West can bluff all they want now but we all know they will be forced to drop Israel just like they did to Ukraine’s war efforts. Genocide is not a casual matter you can brush aside after an ICJ determination.
What does that have to do with the topic?
Removed by mod
Learn to read questions before you answer them.
Gee. I wonder how North Korea was able to create their nuke stockpiles.
Removed by mod
Dump the dollar. Dump US Treasury bond holdings. Exclude the U.S from international activities, sports etc. First two if applied with full effect from “non-allied” countries, the effects on the US economy would be devastating.
CONSIDER THIS MY LAST COMMENT ON THE MATTER.
AN ICJ RULING FAVOURABLE TO PALESTINE WILL BRING A SWIFT END TO THE GENOCIDE HAPPENING IN GAZA. WHETHER THE US LIKES THE OUTCOME OR NOT.
END OF STORY.
There’s no international law forcing and/or forbidding any country from building nukes.
And I will keep reminding you that Israel is not the US in this context.
But the US can fully back and support a genocidal “war” that came to an end all they want after Israel is expunged from Palestine.
Hehe. Not if Hesbolla and the Houthis have anything to say on the matter.
You speak as if openly supporting the genocide of a race is an acceptable norm. It has never been. Not in modern times at least.
And there are many ways for member states to enforce the ICJ’s decision on ISRAEL (IDK why I have to keep repeating myself on this single point) and the US if they get mentioned as well, economic sanctions are just one of them.
When did the US get convicted of committing genocide… Where is your logic?
A lot of these countries are at least ally of the US if not pupets, don’t count on those to do anyting about it if the US decide that they don’t care what the ICJ says.
Don’t flutter yourself too much.
If today the ICJ rules that Palestinians have been victims of genocide, that war is ending in the next few days/weeks.
You can take that to the bank.
Read my comment(s) again and cope with those facts.
The thing about facts is that they are irrefutable and stubborn in the face of ambiguity.
Have a good day.