El Barto

Thanks.

Damn, man. Well, I guess it’s a first step.

Fuck!

Thanks. I wonder why AOC is doing this now instead of waiting until after the elections when the House may (may) flip.

Because there is a process for these things. Now, can someone answer my question?

Why wouldn’t it get anywhere?

Indeed. This applies to both parties, though.

Does this kind of content belong to this community?

Please use more punctuation.

Lol, that was funny! I know I’m being pedantic. I usually make those observations just to scratch an itch. The itch was a bit stronger than usual with this one because it’s a journalistic video. That’s all.

The video has a typo. It uses “it’s” instead of “its”.

This is not some small European country. This is AMERICA the powerful, dammit! We will build a wall around Florida, and we’ll make the sea pay for it!!!

But more seriously, point taken.

Or check out the Dutch and their below sea level communities.

I don’t doubt you’re right, but 30 years? C’mon. You and I know that’s just fantasy.

South Carolina.

It doesn’t surprise me.

It’s easy to do both. “I meant it as a joke, not to cause harm. So I stand by my intentions, but I apologize to Ms. Upton.”

Still, an assholish thing to say, but I would have respected the prick more had he said it. Is it really that bad?

How childish can you be to avoid apologizing for something so… easy to apologize for?

Not really, because if it was “all of them,” then you wouldn’t have said “get one that works,” implying that not all of them work.

Plus don’t pull a Sarah Palin. “Which newspaper do you read?” “All of them!”

Just help the dude and give one working example.

She should. It’s a “public” place, but it’s not like she chose to be there at that moment because she knew Vance was going to be there. She has no other choice than to be there, per the terms of her contract.

No, not really. That just means one or more of three things:

1. Because Biden’s actions didn’t affect them at all. Like a tornado not destroying your house.

2. Because someone else helped them (e.g. Republican organizations handing out money - which is… fantasy)

3. Because in spite of Biden’s actions affecting everybody, those people still had some money left to donate. Like how during a recession many people lost their jobs, and some of those people lost their houses, but some others could still make their mortgage payments.

In the end, I understand what you’re saying, and even though we differ on how stupid Trump’s message is, we agree that it was a stupid (and false) thing to say.

My point about intention was that a lion can be an unreasonable force of nature like a hurricane. So swapping a lion for a hurricane didn’t change your argument.

(I didn’t downvote you, by the way.)

A lion can have intentions. It can have the clear intention to eat you. Again, you didn’t say reasonable intention. You just said intention. But anyway, I know that’s not the point of the argument.

You are still insisting on a scenario in which there are two different actions (lions blocking some people and helping others), whereas the way I understood it is that just one action was the cause of two opposite consequences. I guess that can happen (a fire killing some animals but making others flee and flourish elsewhere), but Trump was only referring to one consequence (Nobody has money because Biden bad.)