Trump makes GW Bush look intelligent, aware of international issues and statesmanlike. I didn’t used to think that that was possible

X

Up till this comment I thought it was just another dumbass showing himself to be an idiot, but yes, now that you mention it, it very much sounds like children may have been abused by him when he was out there. Shit.

Or, if you prefer,

No nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, Nut, Nut, NUT.

That’s 16 nuts in a 30 day month. It’s not no nut November and it’s not non stop nut November, it’s intermittent nut November.

In the sense that a puddle and the sea are both wet, maybe.

“Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of relevant information to be found, not all fact briefs produced by Gigafact Foundry reflect Gigafact’s current methods and standards for fact briefs.”

I think that one comes under the category of superficially balanced by criticising both parties, and technically correct, but out of date in terms of remaining debt and wildly, grossly misleading in terms of the picture it paints.

Lol no, it’s not that you said a tiny thing criticism of Harris, it’s the pages and pages over days and days and weeks and weeks of criticism of Harris and occasional mild acceptance that Trump isn’t perfect, always without detail or ire, and only where pushed, that’s the Republican suppress-the-left-wing-vote talking points.

It he could, he would. He thinks laws are for little people. Unimportant people. Not him.

Which part of “convince left wing voters not to vote for Kamala Harris” do you think isn’t an absolutely key Republican strategy?

Wouldn’t it be great if Trump had to follow the same laws as normal people. He’s a complete traitor to the country.

Lol. You claim to not have said any republican talking points, then right after that you spend a paragraph on the biggest one for leftwing contexts!

It isn’t the win you seem to think. Few people who support Kamala for president think that she has a hope of creating world peace of that America will become even slightly socialist, but it’d get a tiny bit less shit with her and a shed load more shit with Trump, and those are the only two people who could possibly become the next president.

So if you care even a little bit about the people of Gaza, you should vote for Harris.

It’s just that when you keep repeating republican talking points, I like to provide a bit of balance.

By the way, I’m not forcing you to engage with me.

Yeah, Biden isn’t perfect and didn’t always do the best he could, including on Israel. Did I ever say he was a great president? No. But he’s a far, far, far better president than Trump was, and Harris would be a far, far better president than Trump would be, especially on the issue of Gaza.

That was sarcasm.

So you even acknowledge that Biden negotiated a ceasefire deal that Trump phoned his pal Netanyahu to tell him to reject?

Do you even acknowledge that Trump called himself the best King of Israel?

Do you acknowledge that Trump promised to set the military on left wingers in the USA?

Do you acknowledge that Trump is a 34 time concocted felon?

Do you acknowledge that it is the republicans who openly call for Israel to “finish the job” in Gaza?

Do you acknowledge that Trump would be much worse for Palestine than Kamala?

Probably you’ll ignore most if not all of that and dig up something that isn’t really Kamala’s fault. That’s what you always do. Every time. Just like Trump wants you to. You’re his servant, whatever you tell yourself and others about your independence. You’re not. You’re just selling his lines.

Oh yes of course, because everything you said was fair, balanced, non-misleading and good advice for people who care.

Kamala Harris doesn’t support a ceasefire in secret, she calls for it openly, meanwhile Donald Trump, the only other person who could become president, phones up Netanyahu to tell him to reject Biden’s ceasefire plan.

It’s very clear. Your attempt to muddy the waters is just doing Trump’s will. You occasionally claim not to support Trump, but all you ever talk about is how evil Harris is and you can barely scrape a sentence together every ten comments or so mildly conceding that Trump isn’t perfect.

If you don’t support him, why do you spend so much time online parroting his talking points? It’s weird. Anyway, still doesn’t address the point that vegans choosing neither makes things better and voters who care about Gaza choosing neither makes Trump win and things would be worse for Palestine and the Middle East and the USA, and women and trans folk and education, and you’d have Epstein’s “best friend” and “the best king of Israel” back in the Whitehouse. Unless you vote for the only person who can stop him, the imperfect but much, much better Kamala Harris.

Did you see the “Trump is planning a third red scare” news headline, starting the article with

Donald Trump and his allies aren’t making a secret of it: if they win, they’re going to launch a campaign of repression to destroy the pro-Palestinian movement and the organized left.

No you didn’t, not once, and your criticism “I’m worried that they don’t mean what they say so I’m gonna make pretend that they love war” is like a drop in the ocean compared to the evils a trump presidency would inflict on the world.

Aw gee, look at my post about electoral arithmetic vs vegan arithmetic that you ignore completely and tell me DEmoCRats eViL as usual, with your favourite one sided unfair misrepresentation served up as the usual non sequitur with a side of classic @OBJECTION!-style glossing over how much worse trump would be for Palestine, the world and the USA.