I hear that but ‘‘witnesses’’ who don’t understand the process are bound to cry foul even when everything is running smoothly. We saw it in 2020.

Found this from yesterday: https://phys.org/news/2024-10-fast-quantum-entanglement-scientists-attosecond.html

I needed a simple script to combine jpegs into a pdf. I tried to make a python script but it’s been years since I’ve programmed anything and I was intermediate at best. My script was riddled with errors and would not run. I asked chatgpt to write me the script and the second or third attempt worked great. The first two only failed because my prompts were bad, I had never used chatgpt before.

Why/ how? There is an application process and disqualifying criteria for a security clearance. The suggestion is that if you can’t pass that process you should not be let in on any confidential information.

No it was the opposite. Information laid out in his dossier continues to prove true over time as more details are released to the public. Not sure that anything has been shown to be false.

Most criticism you find is heavy on colorful language like “'fake news” and “common sense” but lacks any disproving evidence.

Nvidia Shield

You want evidence?? Are you some kind of antisemite?? /s

What point do you think you are making? You may need to reread the comment chain.

Policies based on their feelings instead of facts.

No sources, eh? Let me help: At least 12 civilians were killed and 2800 people injured by pager bombs. Hezbollah reported 11 members died that day.

Can you explain why you are making up stats with no source?

https://abcnews.go.com/International/hezbollah-vows-reckoning-after-thousands-lebanon-injured-exploding/story?id=113798347

The exchanges get hacked. Passwords are encrypted but not contact info and current balances are not. American exchanges are forced to collect accurate KYC info for every customer.

You wrote that fewer than .1% of casualties from the detonations were not hezbollah. When asked for a source you wrote: hezbollah. When pressed for a source you’ve now countered: “why would hezbollah report that?”.

We don’t know; it’s your premise. Where did you get that stat?

Huntsville imported 1000+ Nazi scientists to work on rockets in the 50’s. That may explain the outlier.

Of course. But their target audience will not consider that for a moment.

I know it’s hard but you have to stick to the facts. Don’t let russian propagandists in beanies tell you otherwise.

You’ve introduced a lot of noise around the simple fact that only one candidate is unwilling to accept the results of the election. It’s scary that you can convince yourself otherwise with enough distraction.

It’s not though.

In the same speech in Wisconsin, Standifer described the strategy to train Christians as election workers as “a Trojan horse.”

What are you disputing? You can dispute inaccurate or fraudulent marks on your credit.

That’s awesome! Just wanted to get you to take a second look in case you were as diligent as my friend but it sounds like you’re right, then!