b1tstrem1st0

Freedom of speech, rationality, pragmatism to name a few. What else, lolz!

That’s the problem. You can elect any representative but you can’t ensure its a good one if the voters themselves are the choke-point, maybe you decide not to vote, vote based on trends, vote in panic or vote for some ideology rather than what should really matter to everyone in a long term.

I wonder how is US a true democracy. Its a two-party system, you can argue its better than China’s one-party system or Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (ahem!) but that’s all there is to it.

We’ve come to decide ‘hate content’ on ideological basis that the question of ‘who decides’ arises. If people could be more realistic than idealistic, that would’ve never been the issue. In this situation, what’s in your head becomes more important than what you really need because something didn’t go your way.

Tolerance is tolerance and it can break any time. You just keep tolerating until you can’t anymore, as simple as that. Its artificial.

Agreed. Let everyone be free to decide. I don’t want something shoved to my face 24x7, its inorganic and harmful.

And we say we are living in a democracy. Mark my word, there is not a SINGLE democracy in the world. It sounds good on paper but the technicalities are far from theory.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

They had a fun time while it lasted, however such inorganic promotion of hypersexuality had a cost and they’ll pay soon.

So what I see is, Meta first creates the problem of trans-metaverse by super aggressive inorganic promotion and then makes it even worse by cutting the expenses on such useless promotion. XD

L for all those who fell for it. Society eats you up (not sexually, keep your pants on) for getting mentally manipulated so easily.

This is not about difference of opinions. You’re sending a very wrong message with that oversimplification. There is no such difference for Nazis.

And deplatforming don’t always work the way we expect.

This is not about difference of opinion. You are sending a very wrong message with that oversimplification. There is no such difference for Nazis.

Deplatforming don’t always work the way you expect.

Let me say it in another way, by silencing the Nazis, you are erasing their footprints, hence making it easier for them to evade serious attention and live peacefully in their own little bubble.

If I was an employer, I would never know one of my employee is a Nazi.

If I talk about benefits. For one, we can track an individual’s history.

Edit: I assume you know how terrorism is still a thing, but I can say most likely you don’t know why it is. That’s the case with most people. Try to think about it.

This entirely depends on how limited your perspective is. A limited perspective leads to more negative actions and an open perspective leads to more affirmative actions. ‘Organized Groups’, who influence others to think like them and believe what they believe, are results of negation.

Monetization of such content is questionable for sure, but I’m affirmative about what he says about the propagation of such extreme views. Simply being unaware about such things won’t make them go away. People should know who they are and why they are so we can deal with them better. There’s alot we can do better but can’t do because of limited awareness and our own negative attitude to deal with them.

Removed by mod