If you applied the unstoppable force and the object of application did not move - then this force was not unstoppable

Force is not a thing that moves. Force is what is applied to an object. In this “answer” whatever is shown and depicted as force is not force.

That is always confusing to me. If I am on a bus stop: “This bus” doesn’t make sense, it doesn’t exist yet. Next bus, is the next occurance of event “Bus”.

If it’s Wednesday, the “this Friday” doesn’t really make sense. There doesn’t exist a Friday in Wednesday, that you call this. Next Friday however is quite clear - it’s next occurrence of event “Friday” on the timeline, so it’s the one in two days.

A great example of misrepresentation.

It’s as actively killing anyone as ground actively kills people who jump out of airplane.

Should it be there? No. Is it safe? No.

But painting it as an “actively killing people” is misrepresentation of other group point of view. Thank you for a great example.

Yeah, misrepresentation of other group points of view is strongly represented in both groups

Millions of people on the bus. Some vote to drive to place A. Some want to drive to place B. Neither is the cliff. But both A voters and B voters are using the bus-cliff false analogy to manipulate people to vote for their option.

In reality the chance that your vote would even affect the result is nearly zero.