• 0 Posts
  • 162 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle
  • There are objectively good games. There are not objectively fun games.

    Half-Life 2 is objectively good, and if you say it’s a bad game you’re simply wrong. However if you say it’s a game you do not enjoy and isn’t fun for you, that’s not wrong.

    A game can be both good and not enjoyable to you.

    Conversely, a game can also be objectively bad and yet fun for some people.



  • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.workstomemes@lemmy.worldI'd watch that
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interesting thought though: in a world where it is normal to own weapons, to protect yourself during purge, and where it is normal for people to talk about plans for getting together in heavily armed groups to protect themselves during purge…it suddenly becomes a lot easier to coordinate in order to overthrow oppressive and evil governments.

    Why do you have an arsenal of weapons? Purge. Why are you talking to people about getting together with weapons and supplies? Purge. Why are you discussing meeting places for your group? Purge.

    I haven’t seen much of those movies myself, but I got the impression it’s even considered reasonable to discuss plans about who you’re gonna kill during purge.









  • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.workstoGreentext@sh.itjust.worksMurica
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    7 months ago

    Frankly I find bikes stupid as a proposed method of transportation.

    I would love to see cities designed around everything needed being in walking distance, with a supply of inexpensive rentable cars for the things that aren’t, like meeting friends that live elsewhere, so we can travel between walkable locations, but at no time do bikes seem a reasonable option.

    They have so many inconveniences and problems attached, and don’t provide enough transportation utility to make up for it.

    A car provides shelter, climate control, a comfortable and relaxing ride, and enough cargo space to transport most things we could need to transport on any sort of regular basis.

    A bike meanwhile provides no shelter from the elements or outdoor temperature, an uncomfortable ride that digs into your ass, requires you to exert yourself significantly, and has between zero and very little cargo space; certainly not enough to do something like shopping for groceries.

    Pushing for using bikes as primary transport is ridiculous; there’s a small number of people for which that would work, but for most it doesn’t and never will. For most people, things are either in walking distance, or you need a car, so it’d be a lot better to restructure our living spaces around walking.



  • Yeah, I find it annoying when the title sounds vaguely interesting and then there’s nothing there but a link. Give us a bit of discussion…if you found it worth linking, don’t you have something to say about it?

    Also people need to stop just copying the title of the article they link to. Those titles are always clickbait. Instead relabel it honestly for people here.






  • The Clark Kent disguise would definitely fool most people that don’t regularly interact with either of them.

    The real dumb thing is it’s portrayed as fooling people who have a close personal relationship with him in both forms and spend non negligible amounts of time around both Clark and Superman. Those people would quickly notice.