Considering their idea of peace is the total capitulation of their opponent and systematic erasure of its population, I dont see what tangible benefit inviting them would be.
Considering their idea of peace is the total capitulation of their opponent and systematic erasure of its population, I dont see what tangible benefit inviting them would be.
He didn’t get the name Gore by gently massaging his enemies
I’m not sure if you’re aware of this, but the internet is serious business
This will make you go hmm until you take .1 second to think about it and realize that Twix wouldn’t offer more chocolate for the same price and neither would any other company, for what amounts to a joke a 12 year old heard from his uncle in the south.
The picture always has the dark Twix broken and added to a longer piece to make it appear longer. Your main clue should’ve been that the packaging is the exact same fucking size. Your second clue should’ve been the break at the 1/3 mark of the dark twix.
It should be taxed on the corporate side. Taxing sugar on the consumer side becomes a poor tax, because poor people will still want sweets from time to time, making those treats now more and more expensive. Well off people will just accept the tax because it’s marginal to them, but when your chocolate bar that you treat yourself to once a week goes from 1.29 to 3.29, then it really fucks your day up.
What should be done is incentives to provide less sugar/glucose-fructose on the product side and encourage companies to make snacks and beverages that have less sugar content.
Kitchen stuff:
Clothing stuff:
Tell us all about it then, colonel