Do u have an alternative word u would prefer me to use instead of woke to describe the outlined definition i provided?
You didn’t provide a definition, for instance “The importance of group identity over individual identity”. You might as well be talking about communism, or the military, or a sports team.
I love that you’ve tried so hard to lead a veneer of intellectualism to the contradictory and reactionary thought processes of the far right.
To sum up your post, you’re describing “anything mush-brained right wingers don’t like” but with fancy bullet points.
Exactly.
If inflation is 10% in one year and falls to 2% the next then stuff is still 12% more expensive than it was two years ago.
I can’t help wondering how many people who voted in the last election understand this though. Single digits?
Define woke.
As far as I can tell it now means “anything mush-brained right wingers don’t like” but maybe you can do better.
Stupid and proud of it.
Why is this comment getting downvoted so much? Asking someone for evidence to support what they’re saying doesn’t seem unreasonable to me.
Yorkshire Tea Gold, a little agave and a splash of milk.
deleted by creator
All religions exist to be twisted by the worst people on the planet, same as it ever was.
Some immigrants, once they become established in a country, will then seek to stop other immigrants, even of the same ethnicity, culture or ancestry, from doing what they did. They’ll pull up the ladder behind them.
What size is the membrane separating one point in time from another? If the membrane is the size of the observable universe we wouldn’t see a difference. If it’s the size of your living room you’d be fucked because your living room only exists at any given point in space time for a very very short time.
I get that you’re upset but having a tantrum and accusing people you don’t even know of helping Trump is dumb.
Now do latinos and suburban women.
Singling out a single demographic for the target of your ire isn’t helpful.
It really shouldn’t be.
All I can conclude is that everything that I find absolutely disqualifying about the corrupt amoral lying rapist isn’t a bug for his followers, it’s a feature.
Double it, triple it, but they don’t get to accept a single penny from anywhere else.
AOC, I guess but we need more people who actually give a shit about the people they represent.
He’s 73 but somehow looks even older.
I hate that we still need him, he’s 83 and should be putting his feet up but I’m glad he’s down for another term.
You’re welcome, enjoy!
Sure, you didn’t do that though. Let’s take the second item, “The existence of systemic oppression and power imbalances”
That’s the original definition, not what right wingers use to deflect away from the original. You’re all over the place.
I’m interpreting in good faith, the problem is on your side. You’re trying (and failing) to assign a definition to something that doesn’t have one other than “anything mush-brained right wingers don’t like”. Just accept it instead of tying your brain in knots.