• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 24th, 2024

help-circle
  • Human Penguin@lemmy.cafeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneTrump bible
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Its def a way around church funding. But a legal one. So the use of laundering weakens the complaint.

    The only potential legal question. Is are churches buying the bible or openly encouraging memembers to. And let’s be honest. That tax dodge is totally ignored by the IRS for so long. I can see it getting challenged as unequal application of law. Unless the IRS dose some major attack on most churches.

    Edit; odd autocorrect. Nuking vs buying.



    1. the first part is only true In relation to the ideals of the supports of socialism.

    Socialists care about the ownership of the means of production.

    Capatalism dose not even consider the term. They only care about the result to indevidual growth.

    As a example that makes my point. Elon musk and space ex is about rocket science to the engineers

    To musk and other who consider space colonisation the only viable future for humanity. Rocket science is just the currently most effective way of achieving the goal.

    To a socialist ownership of means of production is the goal.

    To a capatalist it is just the best way the currently see of achieving the goal of indevidual wealth.





  • LHaving met a good few gun fans. Yeah 7 to 8 guns seems like a low average.

    Helped a friend move from a apartment to a new house. Over 15 guns. I say over as he also had a number of parts. I do not know enough to know if complete guns could be built. Looked like a few complete guns possible to my non gun fan eyes.

    This was when I lived in GA. He was not considered unusual by most of the friends helping us.

    What seems less likely to me. Is all 72m around the US siding with Texas.


  • No fan of apple. Don’t own a single product.

    But my guess they are planning to argue thay this part of the rule.

    “at prices or conditions that are different from those offered through the online intermediation services of the gatekeeper.”

    Mean they cannot allow free side loading when many apps on their store have to pay to be available. Also as they have rules limiting the apps allowed via their store front. Allowing free side loading without checking the activities of the app. Would also be allowing conditions different from their store.

    My guess is they want to argue that the law is badly formed and cannot be followed while providing a safe enviroment within your own services.