• 0 Posts
  • 48 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 23rd, 2023

help-circle





  • First point: fair enough, I see the flaw. But then we’re changing to a more ethical dilemma: does a charismatic person deserve more chance to live?

    Second point: with half the population left, there is more time to solve things (caused by humanity). Global warming, for example, will likely be solved by just the snap alone.

    Maybe he could have made it that every female can only bare 2 children, that would gradually reduce population. But that would put a huge strain on the younger generation to take care of the elder.


  • About the 2 faction problem, theoretically 50% of each faction will be gone. Chances are big that the power balance remains the same. But you can idd argue that making 1 faction completely dissappear is also 50% and statistically possible.

    About the influential people (let add geniuses to be complete). Those persons are not unique, nobody is irreplaceable. Someone else will step up to be equally influential, Someone else will figure stuff out.

    The reason he choose that action is not to be biased and give everyone an equally 50% chance of survival. In his eyes, a cleaning lady deserves an equal chance to a CEO.










  • Fallenwout@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldribbit
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t know who he is.

    I get called those things when I tell people I believe the cause that a lot of young people are struggling with their gender is because of hormone imbalance (before puberty) .

    I believe this imbalance can caused by external factors, like digesting xenoestrogen.

    It doesn’t mean because I think about that stuff and have a theory about it, that I am transphobic. Yet a lot of people can’t seem to see the difference between me just having a theory and “Alex Jones” ;)




  • Fallenwout@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldribbit
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical compound  primarily used in the manufacturing of various plastics…

    … The health effects of BPA have been the subject of prolonged public and scientific debate. BPA is a xenoestrogen, exhibiting hormone-like properties that mimic the effects of estrogen in the body.

    Bisphenol A (BPA), a hormone-disrupting chemical used in food packaging, is present in almost all Europeans’ bodies, posing a potential health risk.

    A recent Horizon 2020 research initiative, HBM4EU, measured chemicals in people’s bodies in Europe and detected BPA in the urine of 92% of adult participants from 11 European countries.

    The Copenhagen-based EEA said the share of adults exceeding the recommended maximum levels ranged from 71 to 100% in the 11 countries studied, referring to levels outlined by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) in an April review.

    I’ll just leave this for you to read further on this. https://www.google.com/search?q=bisphenol+a+european

    If you want to debate this you are accused of being [buzzword]fobic or a [buzzword]ist.