Really? Why did they allow those private farms at all then? My understanding was that the farms that were collectivized only produced enough for themselves to eat, so they went back a little and said “okay, you can have SOME capitalism until we get it figured out”. How they figured it out was quotas, and hey, on paper it looks good. You just have to tell Stalin a good number. Somehow the store room’s still empty.
That’s a good point. A family doesn’t just have to be your flesh and blood though. It can be your community as well, but I know I wasn’t thinking that even though I should have been. I don’t see much of the leadership on the trump team expressing love to even their flesh and blood even if I do apply a strict definition of family.
I don’t think women in general love trump. I think that’s a difficult demo for him. Sure I can find a few at his events but the average woman really doesn’t like him. Does that mean he’s not masculine? They are just inventing little things to be on the surface of what is and isn’t masculine. Walz has the only core masculine traits I can think of. He loves and takes care of his family. Everything else is superfluous window dressing. These guys only care about dressing though.
Republicans:“democrats are trying to get ILLIEGALS to vote. We have no proof but ahhhhhhhhh!”
Democrats:“man do you remember how close they were when they were caught on video ACTUALLY STORMING THE CAPITOL BUILDING! I bet that they may try something else, like those fake electors, or…read the article”
It’s the best… the best syphilis anyone’s EVER had… my doctors…you know doctors say I’ve got great syphilis
It took me 30 minutes to get what they meant when they said "reassigned ". I first thought they meant reassigned to the case that made everything else confusing. They meant reassigned to a different case.
I don’t like the part about the “dictator”. I would say that that one person’s vote does disrupt this arbitrary definition of fairness of you really think about it, but it doesn’t interrupt my colloquial view of fairness and I’m betting most other people’s.
“Hundreds”? Oh my God there are “hundreds” of them. A solid user base for a social media app there.
He’s not responsible for what his campaign puts out apparently. Beyond that, if he keeps getting pressed and he digs into blaming the family I’d like to see their faces when they continue to support him and deny the reality of the world.
The us involvement in Afghanistan was truly one of the biggest blunders in a century and it didn’t have to be. It wasn’t just one president but a 20 year failure in state building, that had been run with profit in mind. The us used to be able to do this in Japan and Korea(only the South though). I believe it was the corruption and the contractors that set up such a terrible state.
The thing is they wouldn’t have a problem with you calling it that, because the whole purpose was to degrade what an actual coup is before they do one
I think that actually came up during his presidency to a degree: https://www.businessinsider.com/third-amendment-new-relevant-thanks-to-trump-military-us-cities-2020-6
“The federal government cannot operate if the president doesn’t have absolute immunity for any act he deems official”
“Yes, yes, good and rational.” -Thomas
“In pretty sure it’s implied we can hire people to work here”
“Whaa… I don’t see THAT in the constitution!” -Thomas
I think it’s rooting. Routing is what happens when I’m playing total war and have a group of greatswords envelope my peasant mobs.
I feel like this could go badly. Tying someone to a permanent location who may be on the radar could be used against them. Also, if they then get deported, which seems more likely if they own to me, whose on the hook? I’m not sure from the article. Does a bank get the house and the money? I can’t tell if this is all state, or state supported through a bank. I could see this abused badly. If the house goes to a bank, wouldn’t the bank have a perverse incentive to report them and get them deported?
The premise is ridiculous not just in that we couldn’t trust this coming from trumps own mouth, but also that it implies that a vice president has any control over any president, much less donald trump.
Isn’t there an argument that the kdp sdp split helped hitler get into power?
The kid was angry, but you are only making it worse with this punishment. The appropriate thing to do would be to send him to a competent guidance counselor and work through his feelings then send him on a path forward. Not really even a "punishment " but a correction. Before reading what happened I would have said that even that would be too much, but having read it, I don’t think it would hurt to counsel him though his feelings. I doubt Tennessee has many competent guidance counselors though.
I guess it’s weird for a son to live his father.
The need for legal immunity is what sent Ceasar to March on rome.