Why are people suddenly defending a Qatari-slaver owned news outlet? Weren’t people like 2 years ago boycotting a Qatar football cup? But now, suddenly, Qatar is reputable?
Why are people suddenly defending a Qatari-slaver owned news outlet? Weren’t people like 2 years ago boycotting a Qatar football cup? But now, suddenly, Qatar is reputable?
Well luckily they didn’t win this time, narrowly but SPD won.
Don’t even try. These people are deluded. There’s no way for Israel to do anything. Israel could probably be invaded, its inhabitants massacred and they would still chant bullshit about that somehow being okay. How has so much of the left turned to unconditionally support the nazi-inspired muslim brotherhood is beyond me.
Epic when you ask any Israel critic to say something legit about it they will just insult you and tell you to end yourself :D great discussion, you sure showed me on the internet by using all those swearwords
Removed by mod
Women are you in the car park and the car is on the floor and the door is open
Travellers?.. Are you American?
Lmao and here bro shows his cards
cute water doggo!
Socially left = they are pro LGBT, generally supportive of minorities, pro vaccine, pro abortion, don’t care about religion etc and on many similar issues. They are in a coalition with SDP. Social democrats also believe in capitalism (with caveats) yet they are considered left. I don’t get what you disagree with
Very simply put: FDP = libs. Economically right, socially left
To all people asking for source and saying bullshit : it takes 1 second to find results on Google showing that it’s in factnot bullshit
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-column-great-debate-idUKBRE97S0KU20130829
You created your own argument here though, right? I can be an advocate for any of one million serious problems that our societies have. Should everyone go destroy art galleries? Housing crisis = art destruction? Unliveable minimal wage = art destruction? Car centric societies = art destruction? Local store increased prices = art destruction? You have to agree that at a certain point this becomes indistinguishable from vandalism.
At what level then is this threshold? Or do you propose a hierarchy of ideas, which are suitable to protest in an art gallery, versus those that aren’t?