And most of those episodic shows are just there for the humour. They don’t have an arc because they’re just there to make fun of something for 20 minutes and move on.

Oh for sure, there’s some really great ones that don’t fit my generalisation.

The problem is that too many do fit it. And all the biggest ones seem to.

Anyways, you’re right.

Yep, there are a ton of those too.

Because most of it uses overly simplistic characters. There’s no depth to them. They’re good because they’re good, they’re bad because they’re bad.

No nuance!

The stories are overly simplistic too.

Not all of them are like this, but enough of them are that I’m just tired of the genre.

Now do tucker

Yep, the headline sucks.

While I agree with you, the video is worth watching, it’s about voting systems.

Agreed.

I disagree. SpaceX is rumoured to have hired an “Elon babysitter” and Gwynne Shotwell seems to know what she’s doing.

But musk sucks.

The good news is that he’s so busy with Twitter and Tesla that he’s left spaceX alone.

I think Elon has become (or perhaps always was) an ass, but somehow he knows how to hire some pretty smart people.

Especially when the judge will have seen the outrage and likely be influenced by it.

I think you’re very right.

I’ve yet to see any decent ones

We are all too easy to manipulate.

The more data they have on us, the easier it is.

Even grocery stores in poor neighborhoods charge more

Damn, this needs to be at the top.

We need to free ourselves from the shackles of roles-past.

That’s what feminism did.

So what if I’m not the breadwinner?

So what if I cry at sappy moments in movies?

So what if I need validation for my feelings?

Society is still okay with pushing this onto men, and it needs a moment of unity to say “this does not define me as a man”

I agree with the effects you’re seeing but not the cause.

Women’s liberation changed how women are presented in society. It fundamentally changed what it means to be a woman.

Men never went through that. At the moment, we sorta can’t. If I were to create a “men’s liberation" group, it would quickly be taken over by Incels. Hard-core feminists would also stir up a fuss that this group was exclusionary to them. So we are kind of stuck.

Manhood needs to be redefined, because many of the classic male role definitions no longer apply. men can be sensitive where historically they’ve been expected to be stoic. Men can raise children when classically they have been breadwinners while the women raise children.

I think these are all great changes, but we haven’t been able to redefine manhood in the same way that the feminists were able to redefine womanhood.

I don’t have a good answer, we are somewhat handcuffed by the expectation to fulfil classic roles, along with new expectations to be more modern feminist-aware, sensitive men. The two are not compatible enough to make for a nice midpoint.

Because it’s likely the first thing you notice and then you look for the harmful secondary traits.

Like a guy that has a really short fuse with himself. He might just have really high expectations for himself…… buuuuut once you notice that first trait, you keep your eyes out for the secondary ones, where he has a shorter fuse with others.

I just visited Graceland, the number of black folks that wanted to vote for trump was terrifying.

They had some really valid complaints about the Democrats, but they had no idea of what trump was, they just knew that the democrats weren’t solving their problems.

No, I think it’s the opposite……

Which part of trumps agenda is hidden? I mean he puts it ALL on display and his supporters don’t give a fuck.

I would bet that there’s nothing there because everyone already knows, and people have already decided whether they give a shit or not

And that’s terrifying