AnonTwo

So…did they investigate uvalde yet or no?

Thanks for the clarification

Are these cases required to go to a state court before they’re presented federally?

While it’s good to know, It feels like it’s not relevant whether an individual state’s courts argue it, since foreign policy has to be handled on a federal level.

edit: I’m actually confused. It’s a federal court in California? what sway does it have typically?

It’s probably because I generally saw the sub shutdowns as a result of the protest, and not as an ongoing protest. Reddit clearly wasn’t in any talks with the mods at that point and vica versa.

Honestly i’ll just go with it being months. I’m basically just arguing semantics at this point.

I mean, I remember it being weeks myself.

But it’s not as if things went back to the way they were either. There were definitely effects due to those weeks.

And true to life, once sickness envelops her, HR will kick her to the curb.

What is the formatting used to denote strikethrough on lemmy? On Kbin it looks like it’s ignoring it, but it has double tilde as a supported strikethrough formatter.

At first I thought half the states are red. But then you realize most of those east coast states are just really tiny

Pretty sure they’re trying to make “we need more control over the internet” into a national security issue, similar to during the cold war. So basically tie him in with a party people in the US really dislike.

Should’ve gotten Cotton Hill. He’d be an asshole but at least he’d get the nationality right.

Pretty sure Cali wants nothing to do with Texas

I feel like every time someone says this, a federal employee should be allowed to audit the schools that person went to on how the fuck they messed up so badly teaching this failure.

I mean, just cause you want WWE’s scripts doesn’t mean you want actual sports to have those scripts too.

I thought the XFL made that clear.

(But yes the super bowl stuff is silly)

I mean, we do have the phrase “Take justice into your own hands”

You can do wrong by someone that receives retribution, without a law being present for it.

Laws just make that much, much, much less murky.

Didn’t the animal tests lead to pretty bad deaths? And wasn’t that less than a year ago? I can’t imagine this going well.

Plus there was the blind-tech that was revealed not too long ago where now that they’re bankrupt the group is slowly going blind and worse. I feel like none of this is going to end well.

To be fair in Epsteins case his testifying could’ve probably put some people behind bars. This guy won’t have anymore information now that he’s been pulled away from the system.

deserves the maximum punishment

I literally said the punishment didn’t fit though.

He really shouldn’t. What the guy did was still legally wrong, and he probably knew it and weighed he would rather take jail time and commit it. A less scrupulous person could do worse things, which is why those laws are in place.

If he could somehow reduce the sentence that would be great, and if that is on the table he should, but some punishment should still occur.

He’s a vigilante hero for what he did, but vigilantes are still criminals. The main issue here is that the punishment is clearly wrong, and the message is wrong, as the judge seems to think this is paramount to treason, which it isn’t.

So the judge is in with trump. Hope none of his cases go that guys way.

Like yeah, he broke the law and needed to be punished. But it wasn’t government secrets, which i’m pretty sure is already legally coded separately from this guys crimes, and also neither of which are treason, which would be the capital attack.

So the guy blatantly spoke against his own legal experience for a political swing.

I mean, I already did. You just didn’t respond, Mr. Intelligence.