Overall, when tested on 40 prompts, DeepSeek was found to have a similar energy efficiency to the Meta model, but DeepSeek tended to generate much longer responses and therefore was found to use 87% more energy.

  • thechaoticchicken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 天前

    So the answer, as always, is ban useless, power-sucking, unreliable, copyright-infringing AI.

    Why do I feel that this will never happen? That we will continue to use this horrible technology to the end of our days with people constantly making excuses for its existence? Ugh.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 天前

      So the answer, as always, is ban useless, power-sucking, unreliable, copyright-infringing AI.

      That’s naive. It’s way too late for any of that. If some country decided to ban AI, all the engineers will just move somewhere else.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 天前

        Quit having residential rate payer subsidize this trash… they want to develop it, fine. Make them pay for it.

        We don’t even get any economic benefits from these subsidies.