I’m pulling my hair out over this. I’ve got a proxmox homelab, an LXC running technitium installed from TTeck’s script.
The DNS server is also doing DHCP for my network. I have an authoritative zone for ‘.lan’
I can get NS, SOA, TXT records from the DNS server, but no A records! The DNS query logs show that it gives an answer, and if I am on the DNS server itself I get an answer, but no other machines on the network hear the reply.
I think this means the DNS server is working properly. There are no FWs in the way as I can resolve other types.
Where else can I look, or how can I diagnose this? I am completely at a loss.
Here is how I would diagnose (I’m assuming you have Linux / WSL on a client)
- Check the DNS record is actually set (yes do it again)
- Do these steps on the client:
dig $domain
check which server answereddig a $domain
should give a recorddig a $domain @server
to make sure you’re querying the right server
If none work, probably network issue (DNS boind to wrong IP, firewall, etc)
If 3 and 5 work but 4 doesn’t, your DNS isn’t authorative.
If only 5 works DNS settings on the client is wrong.
Thanks for giving it some thought!
I have been testing using
dig @192.168.0.249 study.lan
3, 4, and 5 work for TXT, NS and SOA but doesn’t work for A records. I think this rules out a simple network issue?
Just to be sure you do
dig A @server $domain
(with the “A”) and can confirm the followingSERVER is your server
;; ANSWER SECTION is empty (or doesn’t exist)
;; AUTHORITY SECTION mentions your local DNS server
Also check
dig NS @server $domain
Is your server in the answer section?
Yes, everything looks right. I moved dhcp resolution from the router to technitium recently, but hadn’t set up local resolution.
I’m currently thinking the router is the culprit. Here in the UK there are lots of forum posts complaining about the Virgin Media gear. Nothing specifically describes my problem but I’m going to try a new router over the weekend.
Seems weird to me, the router would need to do deep packet inspection of DNS and selectively block specific ones. It feels more like you’ve set up your DNS to do forwarding instead of resolution. Can you post a network diagram and the DNS config?
Run Wireshark on the client to see if you actually got the reply.
Thanks for the suggestion, I’ll grab a cap to check.
I’m running
tcpdump -i any port 53
. I can see the outbound request but not the reply. Will the cap show me anything more?Do
tcpdump host $server
instead. Otherwise you will only see the request (the response goes to a different port).
How exactly are you testing this from your client, with ping? What are you using to query the DNS?
If you run nslookup from the client
- Does the ‘server’ command return the correct DNS server?
- Does <A-record>.lan return the expected record?
I’m assuming you’ve run ifconfig to verify your client’s NIC has been assigned the correct DNS via DHCP?
Thanks for replying, I appreciate the response.
I’m running
dig @192.168.0.249 study.lan
from my client (a MacBook).If I run ‘dig @192.168.0.249 study.lan TXT’ I get a correct response (I have added a txt record)
If I run ‘dig @192.168.0.249 lan SOA’ or ‘NS’ I correctly get the records for the zone.
I think this eliminates the possibility of it being a routing error?