hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-21 day agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up1864arrow-down128file-text
arrow-up1836arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zonehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-21 day agomessage-square164fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·1 day agoThat’s under the assumption that you’re actually getting them to a doctor and not just slapping the bandaid on and calling it a day.
minus-squareTheDoozer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoAnd I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·22 hours agoAnd would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.
That’s under the assumption that you’re actually getting them to a doctor and not just slapping the bandaid on and calling it a day.
And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.