The model is a massive part of the AI-ecosystem, used by Google and Stable Diffusion. The removal follows discoveries made by Stanford researchers, who found thousands instances of suspected child sexual abuse material in the dataset.
  • LWD@lemm.eeEnglish
    108·
    9 months ago

    inaccurate emotionally-charged language about how AI training data is “stolen.” So there’s the motivation I was suspicious of.

    Conversely, it is a strongly contested opinion that taking intellectual property without consent is acceptable. You can have that strongly contested opinion, but I don’t think you should present it as default, neutral, or moderate.

      • LWD@lemm.eeEnglish
        32·
        9 months ago

        What would be the most politically correct word to use? To most people, taking without consent or credit is considered theft.

        But apparently to AI enthusiasts, such an insinuation is offensive.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          61·
          9 months ago

          “Copyright violation” is probably the wording you’re looking for. Copyright violation is not taking or theft or stealing or any of those other words - it’s copyright violation.

          Whether training an AI on a copyrighted work without permission of the copyright holder is a violation of copyright is something that is debatable. But it most definitely is not stealing or theft. Theft is covered by completely different laws.