• neonred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    This says much about respect and social competence in this society when the first instinct is to mock and abuse someone with different priorities than yours.

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          asking for a cashier?

          That would be normal

          “I don’t work here”

          Is a rude response to the question whether they would like to use the self-checkout.

          • Johnny5@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ehhhhh very mildly rude if at all. Like it’s not the most polite response but people are allowed to express themselves too

            • filcuk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I agree, but the argument is that this should go both ways.
              Ok boomer is hardly offensive, unless the target is found to be rather fragile

          • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I would rather someone be rude and fight for what’s right then someone nice that’s propagating a system of injustice because “my 15 mins are valuable”

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            service is not something the client has to ask for but something the vendor provides. Just like you hold a door open for someone entering behind you, you provide that service, unasked. Having to ask for service is a failure in itself, it’s just “no service”.

        • NuanceDemon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          You mean demanding special attention rather than using the self-checkout like everyone else? Not sure I understand.

          • eleitl@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I expect that the management is responsible for adequate staffing. Self-checkout typically doesn’t even work. Not a boomer, not USian, YMMV.

              • eleitl@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 month ago

                Typically they need attendant attention, to be reset to be usable. Which makes it rather pointless. My expectation that checkout lines are to be adequately staffed with cashiers. This is, however, increasingly not a safe assumption, in Germany. I expect the situation to further deteriorate. As does everything else.

                • NuanceDemon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Here there are like 10 self-checkouts per 1 employee and they’re just there if the machine gets confused about a weight. It’s much better, and faster than waiting in the queue for a manned checkout. I can’t imagine wanting to go backward, where’s the benefit?

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            “service” is no “special attention” but I get to the conclusion our misunderstanding might be a socio-cultural thing