• ylai@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    There might be several misunderstandings:

    • Docker Desktop ≠ Docker Engine, and I think what you (and several in this thread) are thinking is actually Docker Engine. Docker Desktop ultimately includes a Docker Engine inside, but it does not appear you need that virtual machine (e.g. running non-Linux code). See: https://docs.docker.com/desktop/faqs/linuxfaqs/#what-is-the-difference-between-docker-desktop-for-linux-and-docker-engine
    • Docker Desktop is based on KVM, which already works with Flatpak. So this is not something new. For example, GNOME Boxes is available as Flatpak and provides a way to run KVM guests in SteamOS.
    • Starting with version 3.5 (the current stable) SteamOS already includes Podman with the default installation. And running the daemon-y Docker Engine “bare metal” is not going to be any easier with the immutable filesystem. While Docker Desktop solves this by using KVM, it adds another layer with performance loss, vs. just running Podman containers.

    So what you want is already available, and no Docker Desktop is actually needed.

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ooh, didn’t know about podman. That’s neat.

      Edit: shame they didn’t include podman-compose as well.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But so if Docker Desktop does include Docker Engine, does that mean I wiill now be able to run Docker (with a some performance loss) simply by installing a Flatpak, i.e. I won’t even need to touch the CLI?

      • ylai@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. If you mean “CLI” as for e.g. pacman install, it is a GUI (Electron) application, so I expect will install straight from e.g. KDE Discover and then run without you touching the shell.