• dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    14 days ago

    He directly called it bad because it hurt his revenue stream. He is ok with ad blocking as long as it isn’t being done to him. That’s pretty bold if you ask me. A double standard, quite the opposite of nuance. He equated it with entering a cirque due soleil show without paying a ticket, which is a false equivalence. He thinks that he is entitled to have his ads seen as a price of admittance to watching his videos. No one is entitled to have their ads watched.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Source on “he’s ok with ad blocking as long as it’s not done to him”? Doesn’t sound like something he’d say.

    • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      14 days ago

      The way I see it is if I’m forced to watch ads when watching something, I won’t watch it. In that case, no ad revenue for you because I’m not watching your shit. Now, If I watch it with no ads, you get the same result, BUT I might tell someone to watch your shit or buy some merch. That person I told to watch it might watch your ads and that person would not have watched you without me telling them to. You’re up 1 revenue.

      The corporate greed is out of control. The amount of bullshit ads and tracking is insane. I’m blown away by the people that defend this shit.

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        14 days ago

        You’re just justifying your actions. YouTube is not free to run, and the content there is not free to create. You’re a parasite.

        Don’t worry, I’m as well - but be honest about it. What you’re doing, and many other gigabrains here, is just pathetic. There is a lot of corporate greed in this world, but this ain’t it.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Google can axe YouTube to stop the bleeding aaaaaanytime they want. And creators can go back to working 9-5 aaaaaanytime they want, too.

          When G bought YT, it was clear as day that the site was unprofitable. G bought it anyway. Now they are like ‘but it’s too expensive whaaaaaa’. Bed, sleep in, all that.

          Now, for about a third of my subscriptions, I either buy merch or am on their patreon. Some are, amazingly, still there just because they like making videos (no direct monetization), and others I watch their vids but they don’t give me enough reason to financially pitch in.

          But you can’t be like ‘oh yt is just some scrappy startup that will fail without your help, you’re killing a platform’. And even the biggest creators out there, I think they are a fucking moron for literally basing their livelihood on a website - run by G, of all companies. gestures to the g graveyard

          Not my issue, not my problem. And I’m sure as fuck not going to feel bad about it.

          • 0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            You are just self-important and cannot come to terms with reality, lol. All those creators and their content would not exist in this form, for free, without YouTube. All other platforms are locked behind a paywall.

            But geniuses like you then talk down paywalls as well, because how dare they monetize their time?! You just want everything for free - be honest about it.