• Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        So if GNOME does something everyone else is not doing, they’re “fucking up”, but if they follow what someone else has done that you like, they’re just creating a “cheap copy”? How do they win?

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        And Boxes looked like a cheap copy of Virtualbox. But now it’s my daily driver because how good it is

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Boxes is so… damn… unbearably… slow. Subpar virtualization.

            • TCB13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Either way, the end result is slow, the UI is basic… and the transition between the host and VMs fails half the time or performs bad like cursor going not where it is supposed to go.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        MissionCenter is a cheap copy of Windows Task Manager (except it’s missing a few tabs, menu items, columns, etc.), so I guess this must be a free copy, then?

        The proposed mockup seems to be a combination of the best features of MissionCenter and Resources. With MissionCenter still lacking many festures present in even Gnome’s minimalistic alternative, I think extending these existing products to actually make a useful Task Manager alternative is a benefit to everyone.