• neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    It boils down to this: You don’t stop MAGA violence by giving in, but the opposite. You stop it by fighting back and holding people accountable. Removing Trump from the ballot, as the law requires, is a first step. It sends a strong message to MAGA: This is what happens when you use violence to get your way. By not taking his name off the ballot, states are signaling that they will accede to violent threats. We should not be surprised if rewarding MAGA violence means we see more of it.

    Yeuup

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Giving them concessions because you’re afraid they’ll act badly tells them to act badly when they want concessions.

    The right course of action is to make acting badly (like participating in a coup, or engaging in political violence or threats of it) have painful consequences.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have no idea why concessions are still being made to these assholes.

      They’re the political equivalent of the pan handlers you give five dollars to on the way into a gas station. And by the time you walk out they forgot you already gave them money and give you the same story.

      They can get their way 99.99% of the time, but that 0.01% of the time you hold them to the same standard as everyone else, they start screaming they’re being persecuted.

      Fuck em. They act the same no matter what so just don’t give them anything. It’s still the same amount of terroristic threats in the end.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        getting more than everyone else and then crying oppression is baked into conservative dna. it’s the essence of the movement.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Whatever happened to not negotiating with terrorists? These people are terrorists. If they break the law, charge them for their crimes.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’re all domestic terrorists, they admitted as much at CPAC; I have no idea why anyone is willing to negotiate or even take them at their word.

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    They’re going to be violent; it’s only a matter of when, how much, and for how long. Kicking the can down the road puts “when” further away by making “how much” and “for how long” much worse.

    • Masterblaster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      i wish they would get violent and we would respond in kind with greater force. give me a reason to start shooting these stupid fucks. let’s get this over with ffs.

      • Nougat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I get what you’re saying, though I would frame it differently.

        Knowing that there will be fascist violence, sooner or later (and with the election in November, that’s the cutoff date), I may be put in a position of protecting myself and others. I need to be prepared to do that protecting.

    • Awhiskeydrunker@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Good point, though I would counter that there’s a lot of blustering about taking our country back but I haven’t seen many serious attempts or people capable of actually planning and executing such a thing, and I’ve had a good bit of contact with what y’all would consider to be American far right rebels.

      For all I know, the far righties talking about their revolution is about as productive as the tankies talking about theirs. Nobody sees a future in this country where the workers seize the means of production and we actually eat the rich, right?

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, it’s Lemmy, so in all honesty I’d say that there definitely are a lot of tankies here who are as delusional as the far right MAGA idiots. Blind adherence to ideology makes madmen of us all, just as does a cult of personality like Trump’s.

  • Corigan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Awful lot of extra words for “terrorists”.

    Because that’s exactly what they are threatening, doxing, death threat, shooting up clubs hell even tried to attack the FBi and of course the attempt to overthrow the government… Literally the most successful terrorist there ever was and we still won’t call it at face value for what the maga group is…

    https://apnews.com/article/fbi-cincinnati-armed-man-b4701596a0eb9770e3b29e95328f5704

    https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/grand-jurors-dox-trump-indictment-b2393831.html

    https://apnews.com/article/crime-shootings-colorado-hate-crimes-springs-b9be567920a55986c57af59535ac9f61

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-shares-article-doxxing-letitia-james-address-may-violate-gag-order

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/blame-abc-news-finds-17-cases-invoking-trump/story?id=58912889

      • Corigan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Terrorism is to drive change and action through the threat of terror/fear etc.

        He’s not in jail, his blinded followers barely got punished for the severity of their crimes and we are all sitting here talking about if it’s democratic to not put him in the ballot and fucking contemplating the very real prospect of a “one day dictator”

        What other terrorist group has driven so much change in their favor? Do we all think Binladin was maybe on to something? How about ISIS …?

        He is closest to really overthrowing this whole ship, unless maybe we all vote for the oldest president there ever was…

        We are on a knifes edge and it’s fucking horrifying and baffling. This isn’t 2020 we all know the “it will never happen” thoughts of trump getting elected were wrong and we shouldn’t delude ourselves with thinking this will never happen either… The highest court in the land is stacked and taking bribes now openly with no consequences, our past president almost assuredly sold nuclear secrets and still lives and allowed to fuck this whole country… What higher power do you think is soundly going to hold people accountable and uphold the law, cause I don’t see it.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          He’s not in jail,

          Many terrorist leaders are not.

          his blinded followers barely got punished for the severity of their crimes

          Most of the violent offenders were suitably punished. I

          we are all sitting here talking about if it’s democratic to not put him in the ballot

          The best place for terrorists is on the ballot because that reduces their ability to call for violence.

          and fucking contemplating the very real prospect of a “one day dictator”

          Trump has already been president. He wasn’t very good. Certainly not dictator level.

          What other terrorist group has driven so much change in their favor?

          All? I see very little changes. What are MAGA demands for change?

          Do we all think Binladin was maybe on to something? How about ISIS …?

          Totally different league to Trump.

          He is closest to really overthrowing this whole ship,

          He’s already been captain once. He spent the time golfing and watching TV.

          We are on a knifes edge

          The knife has already fallen. Stacking the Supreme Court was the only real damage and that would have happened regardless of the republican candidate.

          What higher power do you think is soundly going to hold people accountable and uphold the law.

          The electorate.

  • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I don’t think it’s entirely about “fear of backlash”. I think the real fear people are expressing is the fear of the election appearing rigged, Ahmadinejad-style. If the Republicans nominate Trump, and he goes unconsidered with “unknown numbers” of write-in votes in enough states to affect the election, he would obviously argue that he actually won on votes and might even be convincing to non-Republicans.

    When the Colorado Supreme Court decided against Trump, it was a split decision by an all-Democrat panel that questioned what “due process” should be on the matter. There’s so many ways that this can be spun nationally or internationally by the modern equivalent of the way the South created sympathy through propaganda after the Civil War that survives today. Hundreds of millions of people throughout the world will likely question the legitimacy of the president or US elections after this matter no matter who wins or how chips fall.

    BUT, there’s also no right answer, and none of the above reasons are sufficient to just put Trump back on the ballot and hope. It should never have gotten to this. Someone that is publicly believed by a significant percent of America to not be eligible should not have party support in the first place. And if it did, Congress should have stepped in before now.

    Ultimately, the Republicans are again objectively hurting America for their own agenda.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If Republicans want a candidate on the ballot, they can nominate someone who didn’t start an insurrection. They have no shortage of choices for other candidates. If anything, that’s why the rulings should be laid out right now before the Republican Iowa Caucus.

      In a vacuum, I could see the point of the world not seeing the US President as being democratically elected. In practice, this is only going to be an issue for countries that have their own problems with fascist political parties, and I’m not inclined to care.

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think it’s far simpler than that. Biden doesn’t win 2024 if his opponent isn’t Trump, his entire campaign message is designed to go head to head with Trump and only Trump. The dems don’t want him to be removed from enough ballots that someone else wins the republican primary.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      Exactly. If any other republican runs Genocide Joe wouldn’t even be the lesser evil anymore. Biden needs Trump to win.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          No, the dem partyty “forgot” about that when they refused to codify it everytime they had the majorities to do it.

          Because the threat of Republicans outlawing abortion gave them votes.

          They didn’t want to finish that fight, they wanted to keep it as a difference between the two corporate parties.

          If they can play fight about social issues, their rich donors all stay happy no matter who wins.

          Republicans are just the asshole pro wrestler who doesn’t understand the other guy is trying to put on a show and isn’t legitimately fighting.

  • Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    No insurrectionists in any elected office. Makes perfect sense one would wish to have this key point in one’s constitution, heck, even from the beginning. What about insurrectionists who were appointed by insurrectionist(s)? Seems pretty dubious. We need to either remove the insurrectionist appointees, or expand the SCOTUS to water down the insurrectionists in government. Putin must be chortling in his cocoa puffs.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No insurrectionists in any elected office.

      TBH in hindsight, this was only ever a milquetoast alternative to the gallows.

      Imagine the alternative timeline in which confederate leaders didn’t get to go back to their states and become governors, senators, KKK members, in which the confederacy didn’t get to install one of their own by putting a bullet in Lincoln’s brain, who would then subsequently veto legislation from congress that sought to prevent southern states from re-establishing with the same leadership that led up to the confederacy.

      For that matter, Andrew Johnson as Lincoln’s VP had every appearance of signaling a unity ticket (see? we will give concessions if you participate in good faith!) but in retrospect he was effectively the confederacy’s deepest mole and most powerful enabler.

      Imagine, if you will, the timeline in which confederate leaders were hanged and the confederacy was in fact dismantled vs. being protected from consequence

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Donald Trump is not qualified to be considered a decent human being let alone president.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    fear of backlash

    negotiating with terrorists

    corporate wants you to find the difference between these this picture and this picture

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The “backlash” will be that the people that take him off the ballot may end up being murdered. Or their family might be killed. Or both. Sure, maybe it’s the duty of the secretary of state in each state to remove him from the ballot. But would you be willing to do that if it was likely someone would try to murder you? And consider for a moment that it’s likely that a significant number of cops that you might expect would protect you probably sympathize with political violence in favor of Trump.

    Those are the stakes for the people that need to remove him from the ballot.

    Are you ready and willing to fight? Because you might have to.

    EDIT: People seem to think that my comment about getting ready to fight is in support of Trump. It’s not. If you believe in this 250-year experiment in Democracy, you might have to be willing to fight–as in, with guns and bullets–to preserve it, and that means fighting against the Trump followers that want to end democracy for a totalitarian gov’t. It happened in Germany in the 20s and 30s; don’t think that it can’t happen here.

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      If I took an oath of office you bet your ass I’d be willing. That’s what it means to serve your country in office. If you aren’t willing to uphold your oath, resign.

      I would hold no ill will to any person who resigned their position because they are unwilling but if you want to do the job, do it.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Would you though? Would you really? If you got a email of a photo of your family getting out of their car at Target or Walmart, would you really think, yeah, I’m willing to trade the life of my spouse and kids for this job? Would you be willing to do it that if you took it to the police and they just shrugged and said they didn’t see anything actionable? The fact that we haven’t heard of political figures being assassinated by Trump supporters yet doesn’t mean that it’s not going to happen; religious fanatics have blown up doctors offices and killed doctors to ‘save babies’, and Trump cultists literally believe he was chosen by their god to rule.

        • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Asked and answered, it’s not going to change because you rephrased the question.

          If I took an oath of office you bet your ass I’d be willing. That’s what it means to serve your country in office. If you aren’t willing to uphold your oath, resign.

          I would hold no ill will to any person who resigned their position because they are unwilling but if you want to do the job, do it.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Bluntly, I don’t believe you.

            It wasn’t all that long ago that people got lynched in the part of the country I live in. A candidate running against MTG–she’s the next district over from me–had so many death threats and close calls that his wife divorced him and he ended up having to move out of the state to save his own life. Maybe you would be dumb and principled and do the right thing though; if so, you’d probable end up dead, esp. in a lot of the states that have really deep red pockets. Then the next person who takes the job, well, they’re probably be a lot less interested in being right and dead, and more interested in being able to go home at night.

    • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is why Mexican politicians kowtow to the cartels.

      I thought America was better than this.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        We had four years of a populist far-right president that brought out the very worst in his cultists. The only reason we were (past tense) better than this was because we believed we were.

  • Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I honestly believe taking Trump off would hurt Biden. I feel there’s a reasonable number who are looking at voting for him because he’s not Trump.