• IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Fungi won’t trade if the tree is not giving enough nutrients. So while they don’t trade for profit they sure as hell aren’t engaging in charity.

        • kay@lemmings.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          10 months ago

          No. Flat out no. There is no competition and they’re literally providing what they are capable of to take care of the others’ need. Mutual aid is not a marketplace and the fact you instinctually thought of it that way tells me you need a book on capitalist realism.

          • stanka@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            10 months ago

            Where in that response did you see the word capitalism. Economics exist outside of your agenda/baggage.

            • lugal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              “market place” is a concept of competition in contrast to Kropotkin’s concept of mutual aid

            • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Not all competition is mediated via markets. Mushrooms will compete by injecting themselves into their adversaries using their own internal pressure.

        • BunEnjoyer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          More like two people sharing resources to reproduce more effectively while having a gun pointed towards each other at all times

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      There likely could be other benefits to them sharing such as:

      1. when there is more than they can use, particularly that the mushroom does not like in their environment
      2. producing more leaves is likely highly beneficial for the mushroom, for shade both living and fallen, nutrients and cover with fallen leaves.

      Similar for the tree, but also mushrooms are recycling minerals from dead material.

      I don’t know if there’d be “stingy” trees (aside from vastly different nutrient needs), I could see it more of miscommunication or having too much difference with language/biologic pathways. EDIT: Also I gotta imagine that giant trees don’t even bother counting it for mushrooms so long as they aren’t stressed. Sugar water is in the grid, take as much as you want.

        • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          At first, I read that as you accusing them of being a stingy asshole chestnut tree and I was about to inform you that you were in fact talking to a lemon, not a tree 😄

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Trees that rely on myco networks usually only get giant because of previous myco networking bonds, which funnel excess nutrients between not just the fungi but also other trees within the system. And depending on the involved species, this sometimes includes multiple plant species exchanging nutrients.

    • kay@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      change your name. Assuming you aren’t underage so that psychotic pedo fuck would’t be interested.