Forester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 个月前We can do all three things at onceyiffit.netimagemessage-square230fedilinkarrow-up1878arrow-down195
arrow-up1783arrow-down1imageWe can do all three things at onceyiffit.netForester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 个月前message-square230fedilink
minus-squareTartas1995@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-29 个月前The article misses the important factor of war. Germany has coal in their ground, quite a lot. In case of a war, Germany doesn’t need to get coal from anywhere but from themselves. Nuclear material is much more complicated to get. Which makes maintaining coal infrastructure more reasonable from a military perspective. Also nuclear reactors are great military targets…
minus-squareTartas1995@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 个月前They will phase it out but they will keep them ready enough to use.
minus-squareJumi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 个月前It would be stupid not, they’re probably a lot easier to reactivate then nuclear power plants
The article misses the important factor of war.
Germany has coal in their ground, quite a lot. In case of a war, Germany doesn’t need to get coal from anywhere but from themselves.
Nuclear material is much more complicated to get.
Which makes maintaining coal infrastructure more reasonable from a military perspective.
Also nuclear reactors are great military targets…
Coal is being phased out as well
They will phase it out but they will keep them ready enough to use.
It would be stupid not, they’re probably a lot easier to reactivate then nuclear power plants