Forester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前We can do all three things at onceyiffit.netimagemessage-square228fedilinkarrow-up1877arrow-down195
arrow-up1782arrow-down1imageWe can do all three things at onceyiffit.netForester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square228fedilink
minus-squareForester@yiffit.netOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down14·1 年前You and your fearmongering is the problem
minus-squareSniatch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down6·1 年前No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it.
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 年前Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem.
minus-squareSniatch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 年前Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable.
minus-squareareyouevenreal@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 年前Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely.
You and your fearmongering is the problem
No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it.
Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem.
Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable.
Tax the rich or better yet abolish them completely.