I want to donate to a linux phone. I believe in linux and I want a linux phone. Maybe we can use one in very few years as a normal daily driver. It’s getting closer and closer every month.

I want to donate that we get there sooner. But which project? I’m following postmarket but I’m not sure if they are the most promising. What’s your stance on this? To which project would you give your money to accellerate it?

Edit: I don’t want to buy a phone. I want to support the phone os devs. Sorry for the bad wording.

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    None. The sad, infuriating truth is that the makers and devs are a lot like this comments section: focusing on how good of a computer it is (or what apps it has).

    You do a little digging and beneath all the hype there is a line buried in every review, so as not to raise suspicions, that says something like “now the call quality isn’t perfect, but…” and what they mean is “it will sound like your friends are playing a full concert on a kazoo trying to talk to you.”

    Time and time again. Every linux-based, privacy-respecting, freedom-loving phone team out there seems to have conveniently neglected to make the phone good at being a phone.

    • spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Anecdotally, I have been using my L5 for almost a year now and haven’t had complaints of call audio quality once.

    • Niquarl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Is that because of a shitty microphone and speaker in the phones? Couldn’t just use some headphones to solve this?

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Tbh GrapheneOS.

    Android is Linux.

    And unlike desktop Linux it was able to spread secure and private standards

    • every app is sandboxed, not some opt-in like Flatpak
    • apps start with no permissions (or at least very little), everything is opt-in
    • it is like 99% unbreaking, immutable, it just always works while my desktop Linux broke all the time
    • there is a webview, which can be hardened. Not Electron, which is insecure and bloated
    • energy saving etc work like a charm. 1% battery loss over an entire night!
    • hardware security with trusted element is decades ahead of desktop Linux (Ubuntu is just now getting TPM encryption support)
    • it is a unified platform, with tons of apps, many of them essential (as the platform is so secure), like 2FA, Banking, public services etc. you can have a full FOSS phone though

    I am sure excited for other operating systems but they are just toys. GrapheneOS does amazing work that is a 100% alternative today, for real phones with normal prices, good performance and outstanding security.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      On GrapheneOS right now typing this, love it! I switched over about 2 years ago to Graphene and never looked back. Rarely have any issues, solid battery life, all my apps work, life is good and private.

    • rah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Android is Linux.

      It runs Linux but it isn’t a “Linux phone” in the sense used here.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes I know but the Term is simply incorrect. I dont have a better one though.

        And even though I am excited to use some Linux Distro on a phone I own, it will be way worse in stability, security and crucial app support than Android / GrapheneOS.

          • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Is this seriously your takeaway from a well-thought out post? This the smugness of reddit that I really don’t miss.

            edit: I am refering to the root comment, as that isn’t clear.

      • dragnet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Almost everything you said here is false, with the exception of controversy over the developer. However, GrapeheneOS is far from a single developer project, and the former lead stepped down a little while ago.

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    In my opinion postmarketOS is the most promising mobile Linux OS now. But the phones? Only OnePlus 6 is good. PinePhone is a project to look at as well but the hardware is not as good from the regular user’s perspective

  • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you want to support a Linux phone project, the PinePhone looks most promising. If you want an actual usable phone that runs open source software, offers great privacy and security, good (open source) app support and doesn’t come with ads, trackers or any other bloatware, get a Google Pixel and install GrapheneOS and F-Droid.

    • etenil@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you dont feel too happy about owning a Pixel phone; I would also suggest a Fairphone with CalyxOS as an alternative.

      • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The GrapheneOS team has already absolutely dismanteled the Fairphone on Mastodon:

        Fairphone is an insecure device with substantially delayed privacy and security patches. It receives the Android Security Bulletin patches consistently 1 to 2 months late and receives the recommended patches years late. It has a broken, insecure verified boot implementation. They have also misled their users about support by claiming their devices will get 6 years of support when they can only provide 2-3 years of security patches. That is not a privacy first device at all.

        https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/110272102808113949

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The GrapheneOS team is security focused to the point where it is detrimental to the regular user experience. I.e. “Secure App Spawning” increases app startup time considerably on older devices like the Pixel 4a.

          GrapheneOS is security focused and it’s great that they point out security issues, but for most people security updates being late isn’t an issue. Half the people I know have devices without security updates for months to even years.

          Also, with the Fairphone 5 using an automotive SOC with 13 years of updates, the FP5 might actually be able to receive Android updates for 6 years. Iirc the FP3 still receives security updates, albeit not monthly and a bit late. Edit: The last security update for FP3 is from 2023-12-05. Edit 2: The FP3 got the 2024-02-05 security update on 2024-03-01.

          Also, the GrapheneOS team has very high standards for security features supported by a phone. Basically no phone besides Pixel supports those features, which obviously isn’t a big problem for most people (else we’d have a big problem).

          Anyway, I’ll keep recommending Pixel + GrapheneOS, but imo Fairphone is also a solid choice.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    None, because a phone is useless without applications.

    Edit: I’m all for a truly open-source phone with no tracking but at some point things must be useful as well and applications from the Play Store or App Store are something people have to get and use everyday. For instance in my country, if you exclude browser-based banking no bank will work those Linux phones and the NFC / contactless payment system here requires either Apple Pay, Google Wallet or a proprietary app develop by a banking alliance. Govt provides electronic versions of your identity card, driving license and a ton of other cards related to the govt that also require an Android/iOS app they make… Even something simple like setting up a TP-Link Tapo wireless security camera will require an app these days.

    • rah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Linux phones are not going to be daily driver worthy in a long time.

      My friend’s daily driver is a PinePhone. So daily driver worthy.