• Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    you didn’t even read the article… not that your other reasonoing is sound either

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Why would i spend time reading an article about chatgpt when i already stated that i dont see it as worth concerning yourself with? The best thing to do with AI is not engaging with it.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Because what you said has little to do with the discussion started by the article… now that I think of it, it’s very AI since you completely missed the context

      • cosmOS@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hey, I’m not trying to be a curmudgeon, but isn’t leaving multiple comments on a social media post about an AI article itself a way of engaging with it?

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Im here for the express purpose of shitting on AI and big tech, i guess that could be considered engaging with it in a wider sense, but im not interested in any of the details so imo no its not the same :D