• pageflight@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Article.

    Come on people, this is why you make cloud enabled devices that can still function offline. And why I will never buy a range with wifi (or at least never connect it if there’s no dumb model available).

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      But…why? I can see cloud connectivity for some things… but a bed? The entire point is data harvesting from suckers. Internet of Shit product.

    • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, whether or not a bed should be connected to the internet aside, internet connected appliances should still be usable without a connection.

      Reminds me of an anecdote about a company that did cloud-connected toilets (for some reason?) that one user found they couldn’t flush when they had an internet outage. Their technical support suggested they flushed it by filling a bucket of water at the sink to manually flush the toilet, which would’ve been a janky but usable solution, if the user in question didn’t also happen to have cloud-connected faucets.

      • percent@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I once ordered an Wi-Fi-enabled automatic dog feeder because I had to attend a work thing for a few days, and I wanted a guaranteed way for my dog to get fed at a reasonable time (in case of an unreliable dog-sitter).

        Coincidentally, lightning fried my modem the day before the feeder was delivered, and I discovered that the feeder is incapable of working without Internet.

        So, there exists a product that is 100% dependent on the functionality of some remote servers and all of the infrastructure that connects the feeder to them, or the dog doesn’t eat. Horrible design/engineering.