• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fucking hell you nearly gave me a heartattack… thank fucking god her name isn’t on the actual list - her mentee Harris was though which is still disappointing.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    This article is bullshit. Biden is not going to back out unless God forces the issue. And if that happens, Harris is the nominee, because she’s on the same ticket. End of story.

    All of those other names are only relevant in terms of who Harris might pick as her VP. My money is either on Kloubachar or Whitmer, with Mayorkas as a dark-horse pick intended to troll the House.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        We do have a primary. Biden is currently ahead of Phillips and Williamson.

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Biden is more of a national name. All that means is that if he were to drop out, he’d need to do a handoff and they’d need time to campaign. The problem is that they’re running out of runway if they’re going to do that.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Why would he drop out if his replacements are at a disadvantage compared to him?

        • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because the disadvantage displayed by current polling may be an artifact of no one but Biden actually campaigning, and the recognition of the possibility that, were they to actively campaign, they’d have a higher probability of winning.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Whatever the reason, there is no evidence they will ever poll better than Biden

                • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I might be mis-remembering, but I remember being pretty confident that almost any Democrat in the primaries could and would have beaten Trump. We’re past the point where it’s meaningful to debate whether one candidate would have outperformed another hypothetically (eg would Bernie have pulled more of the disaffected blue collar white voters who went for Trump). It was closer than I expected and closer than I would have liked, but coming off the polling and voting trends we were seeing I didn’t think the Dems would lose it.

                  This is feeling more like 2016 in that the Dems are committed to running an unpopular candidate (like her or not as a politician, she was the least popular candidate in presidential history, except for Trump).

                  There was simply overconfidence on the Democratic side that people would see through the Trump arguments and a refusal to acknowledge that Hillary, while a great candidate on paper, had all the charisma of a Manila folder. Obama and Bill Clinton won on charisma. W kinda cheated and then rode the 9/11 train (but honestly Kerry was a Democratic Bob Dole). Reagan won on charisma. Trump won on racism and charisma (although it’s not a charisma that I get).

                  I think Biden won on being not-Trump combined with reflected glory from Obama and (for the primaries) being seen as the safe choice. The reflected glory is gone - Obama is far back in the rear view mirror and Biden has his own record now. Agree with it or not, he’s no longer being presented as the safe choice by the press because of his policies and his honestly pretty dismal approval rating. Head to head there’s a serious chance he could lose, and there’s not a Ross Perot coming in from the top rope to tip the election. The board is still out on the third parties - who they’ll pull from - but it’s telling that third party candidates with low single digits could swing the election. Again, 2016.

        • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The only reason he beats trump is he’s not trump. Anyone else is not trump either. If Biden weren’t an option, the others would poll at biden’s numbers.

        • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Absolutely. The VP position is not a high profile position, and Harris has been disappointing even in that regard - and I’m saying that as someone from California who would have supported her for president. Whether you want to base it on racism, sexism, personality, or the administration in general, she’s mostly been balancing on the knife edge of being a non-entity and being actively disliked.

          My personal hope was that Biden would make Harris a front and center member of the administration in preparation for stepping down after one term and giving her a slow pitch over the plate to be the next president. He did not do so - she was more in the shadows than Biden was under Obama, and far more than Cheney was under W or Gore under Clinton. The theme for the past four years should have been transitioning, rather than Biden pulling a Reagan while riding off into the sunset. Whoever Biden picked should have played that role. It could have been Pete, it could have been Warren, it could have been anyone picked from the Democratic candidates or from state governments.

          What I’m saying is that there is absolutely no way that we should be looking at a very realistic possibility of a Trump re-election and that this is feeling a lot more like 2016 than 2020.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    And none of them stands a chance against Trump.

    Biden is not leaving unless Trump does.

  • Conyak@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s too fucking late to replace him. This should have started 4 years ago.