The hot Big Bang is often touted as the beginning of the Universe. But there's one piece of evidence we can't ignore that shows otherwise.

…Earlier this century, some very strong evidence arrived showing that there was a Universe before the Big Bang, demonstrating that the Big Bang wasn’t truly the start of it all…

…The differences between a Universe that began with a hot Big Bang and a Universe that had an inflationary phase that precedes and sets up the hot Big Bang are subtle, but tremendously important…

…in a Universe that underwent a period of inflation prior to the start of the hot Big Bang, we’d expect there to be density fluctuations on all scales, including on scales larger than the speed of light, which could have allowed a signal to travel since the start of the hot Big Bang…

Although later fluctuations superimpose themselves atop the older, earlier, larger-scale fluctuations, inflation allows us to start the Universe off with ultra-large-scale fluctuations that shouldn’t exist in the Universe if it began with a Big Bang singularity without inflation.

…At any moment in the Universe’s history, there’s a limit to how far a signal that’s been traveling at the speed of light since the start of the hot Big Bang could’ve traveled, and that scale sets what’s known as the cosmic horizon…scales that are greater than the horizon, known as super-horizon scales, are beyond the limit of what could’ve been caused by physical signals generated at or since the start of the hot Big Bang.

…When we look at the final (2018-era) Planck TE cross-correlation data, below, the results are breathtaking…As you can clearly see, there can be no doubt that there truly are super-horizon fluctuations within the Universe, as the significance of this signal is overwhelming. The fact that we see super-horizon fluctuations, and that we see them not merely from reionization but as they are predicted to exist from inflation, is a slam dunk: the non-inflationary, singular Big Bang model does not match up with the Universe we observe.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    8·
    13 days ago

    My personal, unqualified, non expert, favorite explanation for this and other recently observed data that seems to be fucking with the general universe origin/history consenus lately:

    Black hole cosmology.

    We, us, our universe, is the result of the creation of a black hole in some… other universe, and … yeah, basically; worm holes? No.

    White holes?

    Yes, and what they look like is entire new universes.

    So, if true, that means it really is turtles all the way down, we are somewhere in some multiverse, a nested series of universes spawning black holes which spawn universe which spawn black holes… and there is absolutely no way of knowing anything about when that all ‘started’, or ‘where’ we are in that system.

    Our universe is functionally some other universe’s pocket dimension, but there’s no way to retrieve what goes into that pocket.

    But uh yeah, if this is the case, it could potentially explain some of these anomalies we (astronomers and astrophysicists) are more recently noticing.