• tomkatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    To be fair, if you OCR the pages via camera, you haven’t actually circumvented DRM. That means it’s a completely legal backup, as the DRM on the original file was untouched and unaltered. This definitely does fall under fair use.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Theoretically, yes. Realistically, judges historically believe anything prosecutors tell them about hacking and circumvention.

      There’s been people thrown in jail for the rest of their life for the crime of clicking a public URL that the company didn’t intend to be public.

        • ysjet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Looks like I mixed up two different cases- the cause of one, and the duration of another.

          weev (who apparently is a giant asshole) was the one who got sent to jail for accessing a completely public URL AT&T wished he didn’t in 2010. The EFF took up his case. His sentence was later vacated by another court because so many civil rights lawyers kept joining his team pro-bono so the court tossed it out on a blatant technicality to get the issue to go away, so he only served ~2y.

          As for the CFAA being used to slap people with life sentences, there’s too many examples to know which one I was mixing it up with. Aaron Swartz is the classic example.

    • dermanus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You didn’t circumvent it by breaking the encryption, but I’d say you still circumvented it.