• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    About the first part - isn’t it that if developers don’t do it, literally everyone else has to?

    Seems to me like devs saving an hour to give thousands of man-hours of headache on the side of end users.

    • random9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I mean, you’re partially right yeah - for bigger projects with more devs, they often DO provide windows/linux/etc executables, and that does save a ton of hours.

      But for smaller projects with one main dev, it’s a lot to expect one person to make releases for all platforms. Maybe for the platform they develop for at best - though if that’s not your (not you personally, just general) favorite platform, you’d still be out of luck.

      Again to repeat: it’s a moot point in the case of this context since there was NO EXECUTABLE to provide - it was a python script. So arguing this is completely unapplicable in this case! The original poster was just being an entitled jerk who didn’t bother reading anything and resorted to name-calling.