• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Except then the same gods are really worried about what you eat, or do with your specific meat-based mammalian reproductive anatomy.

    A remote, totally amoral deity a la Lovecraft is at least consistent with facts. Nobody wants to believe in that one, though. You could go polytheist to avoid immediate falsification, too.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The believers would argue that of course these gods have desires but you wouldn’t understand them because you cannot much like the fly in front of me cannot grasp astrophysics.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah. Saying “you just don’t get it and never will” is a great way of defending anything you want. Even if, like in this case, it’s not consistent with the facts. The “it’s a sin to question, so don’t or else” approach has also seen quite a bit of use.

        And for some reason, what god is telling us is always convenient for the powerful, and for the dominant culture…