• ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Fun fact there is literally no scientific backing to field sobriety tests. In fact there is a lot of scientific evidence proving they don’t work.

    • godfish@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, why not use a breath analyzer or something. I am a drunk and could do those test really wasted.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Because it’s harder for cops to discriminate against dark skinned people if they use objective measurements.

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No, there’s no scientific backing to really confidently say that no two fingerprints are alike. That doesn’t change that we can identify them and match them.

          If you observe that fingerprints can be matched, that’s all you need to know.

          Now lie detectors don’t work at all…

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      That’s interesting. Any recommended ones? If I had to guess its a lot easier to find flaws in something than it is to prove it 100% right.

      As I understand it, these tests are trying to get more data on if the driver is severely intoxicated or has major motor function issues.