orhtej2@eviltoast.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoSir?eviltoast.orgimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1514arrow-down110
arrow-up1504arrow-down1imageSir?eviltoast.orgorhtej2@eviltoast.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·16 hours agoFun fact there is literally no scientific backing to field sobriety tests. In fact there is a lot of scientific evidence proving they don’t work.
minus-squaregodfish@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoYeah, why not use a breath analyzer or something. I am a drunk and could do those test really wasted.
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours agoBecause it’s harder for cops to discriminate against dark skinned people if they use objective measurements.
minus-squareHugeNerd@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·11 hours agoOr fingerprints, or lie detectors…
minus-squareRaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 hours agoThere’s no scientific backing to fingerprints? Whaat
minus-squareHugeNerd@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours agoNo, there’s no scientific backing to really confidently say that no two fingerprints are alike. That doesn’t change that we can identify them and match them. If you observe that fingerprints can be matched, that’s all you need to know. Now lie detectors don’t work at all…
minus-squareMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoYou can always take your chances on a blood test…
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·14 hours agoThat’s interesting. Any recommended ones? If I had to guess its a lot easier to find flaws in something than it is to prove it 100% right. As I understand it, these tests are trying to get more data on if the driver is severely intoxicated or has major motor function issues.
Fun fact there is literally no scientific backing to field sobriety tests. In fact there is a lot of scientific evidence proving they don’t work.
Yeah, why not use a breath analyzer or something. I am a drunk and could do those test really wasted.
Because it’s harder for cops to discriminate against dark skinned people if they use objective measurements.
Pigs are liars?
Gasp.
Or fingerprints, or lie detectors…
There’s no scientific backing to fingerprints? Whaat
No, there’s no scientific backing to really confidently say that no two fingerprints are alike. That doesn’t change that we can identify them and match them.
If you observe that fingerprints can be matched, that’s all you need to know.
Now lie detectors don’t work at all…
You can always take your chances on a blood test…
That’s interesting. Any recommended ones? If I had to guess its a lot easier to find flaws in something than it is to prove it 100% right.
As I understand it, these tests are trying to get more data on if the driver is severely intoxicated or has major motor function issues.