Engineers have designed a spacecraft that could take up to 2,400 people on a one-way trip to Alpha Centauri, the star system closest to our own. The craft, called Chrysalis, could make the 25 trillion mile (40 trillion kilometer) journey in around 400 years, the engineers say in their project brief, meaning many of its potential passengers would only know life on the craft.

Chrysalis is designed to house several generations of people until it enters the star system, where it could shuttle them to the surface of the planet Proxima Centuri b — an Earth-size exoplanet that is thought to be potentially habitable.

This plan is purely hypothetical, as some of the required technology, like commercial nuclear fusion reactors, don’t yet exist. However, hypothetical projects like this one can still add to our existing knowledge base and help engineers improve upcoming designs.

Their presentation on Canva

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    the planet Proxima Centuri b — an Earth-size exoplanet that is thought to be potentially habitable

    I feel like we might want to double check this before launching the Chrysalis. Cool concept, though.

  • Grool The Demon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    It is the year 0079 of the Universal Century. A half-century has passed since Earth began moving its burgeoning population into gigantic orbiting space colonies. A new home for mankind, where people are born and raised.

    And die.

    Nine months ago the cluster of colonies furthest from the Earth, called Side 3 proclaimed itself the Principality of Zeon and launched a war of independence against the Earth Federation. Initial fighting lasted over one month and saw both sides lose half their respective populations. People are horrified by the indescribable atrocities that had been committed in the name of independence.

    Eight months had passed since the rebellion began. They are at a stalemate.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    This reminds me of Orphans of the Sky by Robert A. Heinlein. The inhabitants of the ship descend into barbarism over several generations and eventually forget there is a universe outside the ship.

    • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, i think psychology is the biggest danger. A lot could happen in 400 years. Look what happened here on earth since 1625. lmao

  • warbond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love the idea of generation ships, and I think we should use them even if they don’t end up being as important in the long run.

    • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t know, voyager is still working (although it had problems in the past). The plan is that they will produce new things in the way. It is a 400 year old journey after all.

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        No, it’s just normal behavior. Soldering joints tend to break after a number of hot and cold cycles such as a PC that runs hot for 8h a day. The chemistry in capacitors breaks down after some years. Solid state drives, CDs, DVDs and magnetic storage also has a limited life. This also applies to parts that have never been used since they left the factory, it just happens because the chemistry inside degrades.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Voyager I and Voyager II begs to differ.

          We are able to build things that last decades, we just don’t want to do it.
          I am not saying it is simple nor that we have all the tech yet, but we demonstrated it could be done.

          Moreover, I think that people make a basic error when talking about generational ships: everyone think that it would be something like Star Trek or any other SciFi movie, but in reality it should be build to be maintenable without any external support so it must be simple, don’t require high tech to function and redundant. So forget modern processors, the computer, like everything else, should be reparaible without any external assistance (and I agree that mayba a processor don’t last anywhere near 400 years even if not used).

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            in reality it should be build to be maintenable without any external support so it must be simple, don’t require high tech to function

            A generational ship is still a spaceship though, which requires a pretty high level of tech. You can’t build a spaceship out of sticks and stones.

            I suspect generational ships will have to be like small cities, with fairly advanced and extensive manufacturing capabilities.

        • Javi@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          It’s called planned obsolence, and it is absolutely a common theme in consumer products. It’s not exactly new either. We were taught about it in Design & Tech classes here in the UK.

          That’s not to say general wear and tear in soldered joints and so on doesn’t also happen, of course it does. But often, this is seen as a feature, rather than an issue by the manufacturer, and thus becomes a part of the design, rather than something to improve upon.

          When we were taught this some 20 years ago, I remember the teacher showing us one of these lemon juicers and pointing out the biggest design flaw was its lack of failure points. The likelihood is, it will last years; ensuring no repeat custom… Stick a hinge on it like this one, and you’ve gone from a product that will be handed down a generation; to one that will likely fail after X amount of uses. Companies often test for X too, when designing, And will aim for a window slightly larger than any warranties, in order to protect themselves from having to pay out, but also giving the customer a false sense of security.

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    they do have a physicist in the design team but how do you plan this without at least a couple engineers?

    • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well they have a space mission engineer. But the project is not technical, like how to build it, its more like a master plan.

      • Avicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I perhaps don’t quite get what the end game is with such projects but if it critically depends on multiple processes/components which is very hard to achieve (say there has been minimal progress on it until now ex: teleportation) then I feel like it undermines the project. Ofcourse a physicist might help with such stuff when it is science related but there will those that pertain more to engineering.

        • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I think the future technologies that they rely on are mainly the fusion power generation and fusion propulsion. I wouldn’t say that they are far future technologies.