• Saffire@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Can’t IT lock things down if they so desire? That is the owner of the device using it as they see fit: Locking it down so the non technical users of the device can’t break it. That you keep suggesting that devices should come out of the box restricted would make your IT job obsolete and in fact impossible to perform.

    Edit: And before you ask yes I have worked in IT support, although I currently do not.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not corporate IT, but IT for home users, back in the days when things were much less locked down basically every computer i got access too was completely crawling with malware. Had tons of people lose all of their data including family photos and the like because they dowloaded something dodgy off limewire and their system just let them run it.

      Why cant you guys understand that the vast vast majority of computer users are not technical? And as such need those safety rails in place to save them from their own ignorance?

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        they are crawling with malware today, from the factory, except it is harder to remove, especially on smartphones.

        safety rails are not steal walls. instead of walls education is needed. education can happen not only in schools.

      • qqq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        We’ll always need safety rails, I think the thing you’re missing in most of the arguments you’re seeing here is that people want ways over or around those safety rails, and that those safety rails do not need to be as strict as they’re becoming. That is not the case currently and that is definitely not the direction AOSP or iOS are interested in going.

        Also, just for the record, comparing the modern era of computing to the limewire era is bananas.

          • qqq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Not at all. Root access would be a way over safety rails.

            Also the context of this post is that Google is attempting to make “side loading” harder.

        • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Exactly.
          I have no problem with safety rails for those who need it, my problem is that with each passing update these rails become obligatory and non-removable.