• porl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Nah, I looked at it and it doesn’t interest me. I like arch because, contrary to popular belief, it is quite stable (as in non crashing, not package versions) if you only install exactly what you need. I had way more stability issues on the more standard distros since they had so much extra stuff. Debian for servers every day though.

      Nix looks interesting in theory, but is a lot of work and too opinionated for me. Far from an expert though and have nothing against those that like it or any other distro.

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Naw, archer users either become cachy users OR nix. It’s a pipe line with a y junction.

    • Grenfur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I want to switch to Nix… the idea of Nix is compelling. In practice every time I try and test it out I remember that I’m an idiot with a keyboard and I should stop.

      • udon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I personally think Nix OS brings some amazing features, very few of which are relevant for me as a regular laptop user without my own server farm. Sure, reproducible builds and dynamic package versions are neat. But if it takes me 1000 hrs to learn how to write a functional config file that I now have to keep updated, if I have to work with some weird repository, there is no documentation and community infighting… Nah, I’ll stick to debian (BTW) for a while.