• MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Sure, I’ve tried it but honestly there wasn’t much difference. I use pfsense because its what I started with. I imagine if you started with opnsense it would be the same thing. I use pfsense+ licensing for all the routers at work and that makes the higher ups happy that its has commercial support if needed.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Tried that for awhile at home, just didn’t seem as robust. Also, you can get Netgate hardware if the company doesn’t want a 10-yo Dell running the edge.

      • MehBlah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Bought some of the higher end negate routers for work. 1u rack mount. Five locations all linked with fail over tunnels. I run our filter and monitoring on them as well . Pfblockng works great for general purpose filtering. When you filter porn you really need a lot of ram. The intel boards they have are a little finicky on the type of SFP you can install but other than that they work great.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’ve had opnsense running for 7 years without a single issue. It might be the most reliable part of my whole setup.